SSFNX vs. PBRNX
SSFNX (State Street Target Retirement Fund) and PBRNX (PIMCO RealPath Blend Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, SSFNX returned 5.84%/yr vs 6.84%/yr for PBRNX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSFNX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for PBRNX.
Performance
SSFNX vs. PBRNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSFNX achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly lower than PBRNX's 6.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SSFNX has underperformed PBRNX with an annualized return of 5.84%, while PBRNX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.84% annualized return.
SSFNX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 5.13%
- 6M
- 5.02%
- 1Y
- 12.01%
- 3Y*
- 9.36%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
PBRNX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 6M
- 6.25%
- 1Y
- 15.33%
- 3Y*
- 9.86%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 6.84%
SSFNX vs. PBRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSFNX State Street Target Retirement Fund | 5.13% | 10.93% | 7.05% | 10.73% | -12.21% | 6.87% | 10.26% | 13.97% | -2.49% | 8.92% |
PBRNX PIMCO RealPath Blend Income Fund | 6.15% | 13.57% | 5.63% | 12.03% | -16.09% | 9.00% | 13.87% | 16.48% | -4.14% | 12.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSFNX and PBRNX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SSFNX and PBRNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSFNX vs. PBRNX — Risk / Return Rank
SSFNX
PBRNX
SSFNX vs. PBRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement Fund (SSFNX) and PIMCO RealPath Blend Income Fund (PBRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSFNX | PBRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.43 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 2.71 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.06 | 11.91 | +3.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSFNX vs. PBRNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSFNX drawdown since its inception was -16.62%, smaller than the maximum PBRNX drawdown of -21.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSFNX and PBRNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSFNX | PBRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.62% | -21.90% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.52% | -5.66% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.40% | -8.33% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.62% | -21.90% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.62% | -21.90% | +5.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.23% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -3.77% | +1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 1.28% | -0.49% |
Volatility
SSFNX vs. PBRNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Target Retirement Fund (SSFNX) is 1.99%, while PIMCO RealPath Blend Income Fund (PBRNX) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that SSFNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSFNX | PBRNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.99% | 2.77% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.91% | 5.81% | -1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.70% | 6.93% | -2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.62% | 8.45% | -1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.58% | 7.96% | -1.38% |
SSFNX vs. PBRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSFNX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than PBRNX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSFNX vs. PBRNX - Dividend Comparison
SSFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than PBRNX's 5.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBRNX PIMCO RealPath Blend Income Fund | 5.12% | 4.19% | 4.56% | 4.16% | 3.63% | 5.95% | 4.29% | 4.42% | 2.48% | 2.16% | 3.17% | 2.57% |
SSFNX State Street Target Retirement Fund | 4.63% | 4.86% | 5.78% | 5.26% | 5.12% | 6.69% | 1.61% | 3.35% | 4.40% | 2.72% | 1.84% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SSFNX and PBRNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PBRNX has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to SSFNX (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSFNX dropped -16.62% vs PBRNX's -21.90%.
SSFNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SSFNX and PBRNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer