PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSDJX vs. FIKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSDJX vs. FIKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund (SSDJX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSDJX achieves a 11.65% return, which is significantly higher than FIKFX's 4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SSDJX has outperformed FIKFX with an annualized return of 11.08%, while FIKFX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.24% annualized return.


SSDJX

1D
0.48%
1M
4.83%
YTD
11.65%
6M
12.37%
1Y
26.99%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
11.08%

FIKFX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.67%
YTD
4.19%
6M
4.33%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
7.66%
5Y*
3.25%
10Y*
4.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSDJX vs. FIKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSDJX
State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund
11.65%20.71%12.35%19.18%-19.24%13.12%19.69%25.73%-8.12%18.90%
FIKFX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class
4.19%9.23%4.96%8.28%-11.09%2.79%8.54%10.59%-0.76%6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SSDJX and FIKFX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.75

The correlation between SSDJX and FIKFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (5 years) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSDJX vs. FIKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSDJX
SSDJX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SSDJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSDJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSDJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SSDJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSDJX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKFX
FIKFX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FIKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSDJX vs. FIKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund (SSDJX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSDJXFIKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.54

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

3.15

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.40

14.03

-0.64

SSDJX vs. FIKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSDJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FIKFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSDJX and FIKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSDJXFIKFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.63

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.64

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.96

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

1.01

-0.33

Drawdowns

SSDJX vs. FIKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSDJX drawdown since its inception was -29.95%, which is greater than FIKFX's maximum drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSDJX and FIKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSDJXFIKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.95%

-15.03%

-14.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-3.32%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.70%

-4.76%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.45%

-15.03%

-12.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.95%

-15.03%

-14.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.05%

-1.72%

-3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

0.74%

+1.30%

Volatility

SSDJX vs. FIKFX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund (SSDJX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class (FIKFX) at 1.49%. This indicates that SSDJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSDJXFIKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

1.49%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

3.31%

+5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.92%

3.98%

+6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.12%

5.12%

+9.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.77%

4.44%

+10.33%

SSDJX vs. FIKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSDJX has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKFX's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSDJX vs. FIKFX - Dividend Comparison

SSDJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, more than FIKFX's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIKFX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Investor Class
3.19%3.40%3.13%2.85%3.06%2.04%2.18%7.27%2.94%1.89%1.65%1.39%
SSDJX
State Street Target Retirement 2050 Fund
5.42%6.05%4.63%3.13%5.47%4.87%4.13%6.79%5.05%0.45%1.73%1.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSDJX and FIKFX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSDJX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to FIKFX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSDJX dropped -29.95% vs FIKFX's -15.03%.

FIKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSDJX and FIKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer