PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCVX vs. VRTVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSCVX vs. VRTVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCVX achieves a 21.10% return, which is significantly higher than VRTVX's 18.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCVX has underperformed VRTVX with an annualized return of 9.68%, while VRTVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.48% annualized return.


SSCVX

1D
1.61%
1M
3.17%
YTD
21.10%
6M
19.02%
1Y
36.19%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
9.68%

VRTVX

1D
0.95%
1M
4.04%
YTD
18.94%
6M
18.07%
1Y
43.21%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
10.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCVX vs. VRTVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
21.10%5.46%12.33%12.47%-15.35%31.25%9.61%18.76%-13.70%12.65%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
18.94%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%28.06%4.81%22.40%-12.83%7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCVX and VRTVX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.94

The correlation between SSCVX and VRTVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSCVX vs. VRTVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCVX
SSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCVX vs. VRTVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSCVXVRTVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.43

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.86

5.34

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.00

18.14

-3.14

SSCVX vs. VRTVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the VRTVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCVX and VRTVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSCVXVRTVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.54

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.32

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.44

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.48

-0.15

Drawdowns

SSCVX vs. VRTVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.34%, which is greater than VRTVX's maximum drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCVX and VRTVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCVXVRTVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.34%

-45.98%

-19.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.88%

-8.54%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.22%

-26.85%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.22%

-26.85%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.87%

-45.98%

-2.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-0.25%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.85%

-7.78%

-4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.51%

+0.04%

Volatility

SSCVX vs. VRTVX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) have volatilities of 4.75% and 4.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSCVXVRTVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

4.90%

-0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.89%

11.98%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.41%

17.95%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.20%

21.67%

-0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.46%

23.71%

-0.25%

SSCVX vs. VRTVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCVX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSCVX vs. VRTVX - Dividend Comparison

SSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than VRTVX's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
9.05%10.96%20.45%6.56%4.62%6.64%6.45%0.12%7.59%13.50%6.18%12.44%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.58%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSCVX and VRTVX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRTVX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to SSCVX (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCVX dropped -65.34% vs VRTVX's -45.98%.

VRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSCVX and VRTVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer