SSCVX vs. ARSMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX).
SSCVX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Apr 25, 1997. ARSMX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Mar 29, 2007.
Performance
SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund | 5.82% | 5.46% | 12.33% | 12.47% | -15.35% | 31.25% | 9.61% | 18.76% | -13.70% | 12.65% |
ARSMX AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund | -3.04% | -0.83% | 12.42% | 14.48% | -8.62% | 23.41% | 1.71% | 34.82% | -6.44% | 15.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSCVX achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly higher than ARSMX's -3.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCVX has underperformed ARSMX with an annualized return of 8.32%, while ARSMX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.33% annualized return.
SSCVX
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -6.22%
- YTD
- 5.82%
- 6M
- 6.09%
- 1Y
- 22.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.32%
ARSMX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- -3.04%
- 6M
- -5.91%
- 1Y
- -0.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSCVX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ARSMX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SSCVX vs. ARSMX — Risk / Return Rank
SSCVX
ARSMX
SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSCVX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | -0.02 | +1.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 0.10 | +1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.01 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | -0.18 | +1.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.44 | -0.55 | +5.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSCVX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | -0.02 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.23 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.48 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.35 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSCVX and ARSMX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Dividend Comparison
SSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.36%, while ARSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund | 10.36% | 10.96% | 20.45% | 6.56% | 4.62% | 6.64% | 6.45% | 0.12% | 7.59% | 13.50% | 6.18% | 12.44% |
ARSMX AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.27% | 3.89% | 4.85% | 5.86% | 0.00% | 3.60% | 8.60% | 15.66% | 8.03% | 17.82% |
Drawdowns
SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.34%, which is greater than ARSMX's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCVX and ARSMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSCVX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.34% | -51.75% | -13.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.41% | -12.25% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.22% | -19.34% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.87% | -42.96% | -5.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.88% | -10.31% | +2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.91% | -8.12% | -3.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 4.04% | -0.30% |
Volatility
SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) at 3.68%. This indicates that SSCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSCVX | ARSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 3.68% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 11.17% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.83% | 18.46% | +4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 17.87% | +3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 19.59% | +3.85% |