PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCVX vs. ARSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCVX achieves a 27.34% return, which is significantly higher than ARSMX's 10.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SSCVX having a 9.95% annualized return and ARSMX not far ahead at 10.18%.


SSCVX

1D
1.14%
1M
0.52%
6M
19.06%
YTD
27.34%
1Y
39.97%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
9.95%
ALL TIME*
7.83%

ARSMX

1D
-1.31%
1M
2.53%
6M
8.11%
YTD
10.49%
1Y
9.57%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
10.18%
ALL TIME*
7.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
27.34%5.46%12.33%12.47%-15.35%31.25%9.61%18.76%-13.70%12.65%
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
10.49%-0.83%12.42%14.48%-8.62%23.41%1.71%34.82%-6.44%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCVX and ARSMX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2007

0.91

The correlation between SSCVX and ARSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSCVX vs. ARSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SSCVX
SSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ARSMX
ARSMX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ARSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ARSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) and AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSCVXARSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.10

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

0.71

+3.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.87

1.64

+13.24

SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the ARSMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCVX and ARSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCVX drawdown since its inception was -65.34%, which is greater than ARSMX's maximum drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCVX and ARSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCVXARSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.34%

-51.75%

-13.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.88%

-10.37%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.22%

-19.34%

-9.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.22%

-19.34%

-9.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.87%

-42.96%

-5.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-1.59%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.79%

-8.06%

-3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

4.47%

-1.95%

Volatility

SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) is 3.30%, while AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund (ARSMX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that SSCVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSCVXARSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

4.05%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.93%

9.15%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

14.41%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.04%

17.71%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.35%

19.51%

+3.84%

SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCVX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ARSMX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSCVX vs. ARSMX - Dividend Comparison

SSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.61%, while ARSMX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARSMX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value Fund
0.00%0.00%9.27%3.89%4.85%5.86%0.00%3.60%8.60%15.66%8.03%17.82%
SSCVX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund
8.61%10.96%20.45%6.56%4.62%6.64%6.45%0.12%7.59%13.50%6.18%12.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSCVX and ARSMX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARSMX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to SSCVX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCVX dropped -65.34% vs ARSMX's -51.75%.

SSCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSCVX and ARSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer