SSCPX vs. RYVPX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

SSCPX (Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio) and RYVPX (Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SSCPX returned 11.11%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for RYVPX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSCPX charges 1.70%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for RYVPX.

Performance

SSCPX vs. RYVPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) and Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SSCPX having a 23.80% return and RYVPX slightly lower at 23.23%. Over the past 10 years, SSCPX has underperformed RYVPX with an annualized return of 11.11%, while RYVPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.

SSCPX

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 17.13%
• YTD: 23.80%
• 1Y: 32.49%
• 3Y*: 16.33%
• 5Y*: 8.61%
• 10Y*: 11.11%

RYVPX

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 5.84%
• 6M: 16.36%
• YTD: 23.23%
• 1Y: 38.38%
• 3Y*: 21.83%
• 5Y*: 5.33%
• 10Y*: 12.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCPX vs. RYVPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio	23.80%	6.41%	10.79%	15.16%	-17.56%	24.53%	25.39%	23.71%	-16.14%	15.58%
RYVPX Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund	23.23%	19.53%	21.81%	16.97%	-32.45%	6.61%	49.45%	23.68%	-10.81%	17.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCPX and RYVPX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2001	0.89

The correlation between SSCPX and RYVPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SSCPX vs. RYVPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCPX

SSCPX Risk / Return Rank: 53
SSCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SSCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SSCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SSCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
SSCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

RYVPX

RYVPX Risk / Return Rank: 57
RYVPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
RYVPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
RYVPX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RYVPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
RYVPX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCPX vs. RYVPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) and Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSCPX	RYVPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.75	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.45	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.29	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	2.43	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.02	8.01	+1.01

SSCPX vs. RYVPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the RYVPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCPX and RYVPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SSCPX vs. RYVPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCPX drawdown since its inception was -53.65%, smaller than the maximum RYVPX drawdown of -59.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCPX and RYVPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSCPX	RYVPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.65%	-59.03%	+5.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.54%	-15.22%	+3.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.78%	-25.76%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.78%	-48.19%	+20.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.59%	-48.19%	+4.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.61%	-2.04%	-2.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-13.12%	+2.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	4.62%	-1.17%

Volatility

SSCPX vs. RYVPX - Volatility Comparison

Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio (SSCPX) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) at 6.15%. This indicates that SSCPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYVPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SSCPX	RYVPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.23%	6.15%	+1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.84%	15.98%	-0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.68%	21.14%	-0.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.28%	26.42%	-4.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.02%	24.95%	-1.93%

SSCPX vs. RYVPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCPX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RYVPX's 1.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSCPX vs. RYVPX - Dividend Comparison

SSCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, less than RYVPX's 13.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RYVPX Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund	13.62%	16.79%	2.92%	0.00%	4.34%	34.97%	10.32%	3.47%	45.66%	20.89%	11.40%	24.57%
SSCPX Saratoga Small Capitalization Portfolio	7.28%	9.02%	11.37%	0.00%	10.18%	24.67%	0.02%	0.00%	17.42%	0.00%	0.00%	58.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSCPX and RYVPX in my portfolio?

SSCPX and RYVPX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SSCPX or RYVPX?

SSCPX has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to RYVPX (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCPX dropped -53.65% vs RYVPX's -59.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYVPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.