PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYVPX vs. RYDVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYVPX vs. RYDVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) and Royce Dividend Value Fund (RYDVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYVPX achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly lower than RYDVX's 19.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RYVPX having a 11.95% annualized return and RYDVX not far behind at 11.46%.


RYVPX

1D
2.21%
1M
-3.75%
6M
16.52%
YTD
18.61%
1Y
33.19%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
11.95%
ALL TIME*
11.13%

RYDVX

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.54%
6M
11.63%
YTD
19.75%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
11.07%
10Y*
11.46%
ALL TIME*
9.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYVPX vs. RYDVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYVPX
Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund
18.61%19.53%21.81%16.97%-32.45%6.61%49.45%23.68%-10.81%17.71%
RYDVX
Royce Dividend Value Fund
19.75%9.44%19.41%23.29%-13.63%20.00%4.45%30.00%-16.33%21.39%

Correlation

The correlation between RYVPX and RYDVX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005

0.85

The correlation between RYVPX and RYDVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYVPX vs. RYDVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYVPX
RYVPX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RYVPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYVPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYVPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RYVPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYVPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

RYDVX
RYDVX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
RYDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RYDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYVPX vs. RYDVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) and Royce Dividend Value Fund (RYDVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYVPXRYDVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.31

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

6.68

-0.15

RYVPX vs. RYDVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYVPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the RYDVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYVPX and RYDVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYVPX vs. RYDVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYVPX drawdown since its inception was -59.03%, which is greater than RYDVX's maximum drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYVPX and RYDVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYVPXRYDVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.03%

-53.36%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-12.32%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.76%

-21.45%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.19%

-27.35%

-20.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.19%

-41.49%

-6.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.71%

-0.75%

-4.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.10%

-7.49%

-5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

4.26%

+0.49%

Volatility

RYVPX vs. RYDVX - Volatility Comparison

Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Royce Dividend Value Fund (RYDVX) at 4.57%. This indicates that RYVPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYDVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYVPXRYDVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

4.57%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.62%

11.73%

+4.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.54%

18.50%

+3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.42%

19.07%

+7.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.00%

19.62%

+5.38%

RYVPX vs. RYDVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYVPX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RYDVX's 1.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYVPX vs. RYDVX - Dividend Comparison

RYVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.15%, less than RYDVX's 154.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYDVX
Royce Dividend Value Fund
154.32%185.21%21.24%11.80%0.57%14.07%5.55%15.61%14.15%14.26%10.48%11.39%
RYVPX
Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund
14.15%16.79%2.92%0.00%4.34%34.97%10.32%3.47%45.66%20.89%11.40%24.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYVPX and RYDVX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYVPX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to RYDVX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYVPX dropped -59.03% vs RYDVX's -53.36%.

RYDVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYVPX and RYDVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer