RYVPX vs. FTHNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX).
RYVPX is managed by Royce Investment Partners. It was launched on Jun 14, 2001. FTHNX is managed by Fuller & Thaler Asset Mgmt. It was launched on Sep 8, 2011.
Performance
RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYVPX Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund | -5.01% | 19.53% | 21.81% | 16.97% | -32.45% | 6.61% | 49.45% | 23.68% | -10.81% | 17.71% |
FTHNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund | 0.58% | 11.69% | 15.81% | 22.18% | -7.73% | 30.44% | 10.05% | 27.74% | -13.45% | 17.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYVPX achieves a -5.01% return, which is significantly lower than FTHNX's 0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, RYVPX has underperformed FTHNX with an annualized return of 9.90%, while FTHNX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.10% annualized return.
RYVPX
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- -5.01%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.90%
FTHNX
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 19.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYVPX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHNX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RYVPX vs. FTHNX — Risk / Return Rank
RYVPX
FTHNX
RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RYVPX | FTHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.06 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | 1.63 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.21 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.72 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.43 | 6.65 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RYVPX | FTHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.06 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.50 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.65 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.61 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between RYVPX and FTHNX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Dividend Comparison
RYVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.67%, more than FTHNX's 0.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYVPX Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund | 17.67% | 16.79% | 2.92% | 0.00% | 4.34% | 34.97% | 10.32% | 3.47% | 45.66% | 20.89% | 11.40% | 24.57% |
FTHNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund | 0.28% | 0.28% | 7.84% | 1.60% | 0.95% | 3.55% | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.21% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 15.47% |
Drawdowns
RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYVPX drawdown since its inception was -59.03%, which is greater than FTHNX's maximum drawdown of -37.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYVPX and FTHNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYVPX | FTHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.03% | -37.78% | -21.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.22% | -12.40% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.19% | -24.63% | -23.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.19% | -37.78% | -10.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.01% | -7.24% | -4.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.24% | -5.77% | -7.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.52% | 3.21% | +1.31% |
Volatility
RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Volatility Comparison
Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX) at 5.74%. This indicates that RYVPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RYVPX | FTHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.37% | 5.74% | +2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.85% | 10.90% | +4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 19.72% | +4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.32% | 18.93% | +7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 20.10% | +4.77% |