PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYVPX vs. FTHNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYVPX achieves a 18.61% return, which is significantly higher than FTHNX's 16.92% return. Over the past 10 years, RYVPX has underperformed FTHNX with an annualized return of 11.95%, while FTHNX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.81% annualized return.


RYVPX

1D
2.21%
1M
-3.75%
6M
16.52%
YTD
18.61%
1Y
33.19%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
11.95%
ALL TIME*
11.13%

FTHNX

1D
0.55%
1M
1.93%
6M
12.96%
YTD
16.92%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*
13.81%
ALL TIME*
13.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYVPX
Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund
18.61%19.53%21.81%16.97%-32.45%6.61%49.45%23.68%-10.81%17.71%
FTHNX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund
16.92%11.69%15.81%22.18%-7.73%30.44%10.05%27.74%-13.45%17.25%

Correlation

The correlation between RYVPX and FTHNX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2015

0.82

The correlation between RYVPX and FTHNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYVPX vs. FTHNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RYVPX
RYVPX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
RYVPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYVPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYVPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RYVPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYVPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHNX
FTHNX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RYVPXFTHNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

2.77

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

9.95

-3.42

RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYVPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the FTHNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYVPX and FTHNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYVPX drawdown since its inception was -59.03%, which is greater than FTHNX's maximum drawdown of -37.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYVPX and FTHNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYVPXFTHNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.03%

-37.78%

-21.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-9.44%

-5.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.76%

-24.63%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.19%

-24.63%

-23.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.19%

-37.78%

-10.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.71%

-0.51%

-5.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.10%

-5.62%

-7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

2.62%

+2.13%

Volatility

RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Volatility Comparison

Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund (RYVPX) has a higher volatility of 6.33% compared to Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX) at 3.38%. This indicates that RYVPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYVPXFTHNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

3.38%

+2.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.62%

10.76%

+5.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.54%

14.92%

+6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.42%

18.78%

+7.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.00%

20.07%

+4.93%

RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYVPX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHNX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RYVPX vs. FTHNX - Dividend Comparison

RYVPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.15%, more than FTHNX's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTHNX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund
0.24%0.28%7.84%1.60%0.95%3.55%0.11%0.11%0.21%0.09%0.00%15.47%
RYVPX
Royce Smaller-Companies Growth Fund
14.15%16.79%2.92%0.00%4.34%34.97%10.32%3.47%45.66%20.89%11.40%24.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


RYVPX and FTHNX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RYVPX has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to FTHNX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYVPX dropped -59.03% vs FTHNX's -37.78%.

FTHNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYVPX and FTHNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer