PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCNX vs. JRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSCNX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Target Retirement 2040 Fund (SSCNX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCNX achieves a 9.51% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCNX has underperformed JRLVX with an annualized return of 10.20%, while JRLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.28% annualized return.


SSCNX

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.19%
YTD
9.51%
6M
9.85%
1Y
22.92%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
7.41%
10Y*
10.20%

JRLVX

1D
-0.71%
1M
3.39%
YTD
11.53%
6M
12.12%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCNX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSCNX
State Street Target Retirement 2040 Fund
9.51%19.00%11.21%17.68%-18.55%11.75%18.72%24.61%-7.45%18.32%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
11.53%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%16.23%25.03%-8.29%17.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCNX and JRLVX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.97

The correlation between SSCNX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSCNX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCNX
SSCNX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
SSCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCNX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement 2040 Fund (SSCNX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSCNXJRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.43

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

3.16

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.70

14.03

-1.32

SSCNX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCNX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSCNXJRLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.38

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.63

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.71

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.65

+0.04

Drawdowns

SSCNX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCNX drawdown since its inception was -27.49%, smaller than the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCNX and JRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCNXJRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.49%

-32.53%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.96%

-8.50%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.72%

-15.27%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.14%

-25.64%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.49%

-32.53%

+5.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.71%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-4.56%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

1.91%

-0.06%

Volatility

SSCNX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Target Retirement 2040 Fund (SSCNX) is 3.12%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that SSCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSCNXJRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

3.41%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

8.97%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.64%

11.29%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.73%

14.77%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.46%

15.99%

-2.53%

SSCNX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCNX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSCNX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

SSCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than JRLVX's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.19%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%
SSCNX
State Street Target Retirement 2040 Fund
6.58%7.21%4.97%3.78%5.39%5.58%4.63%6.31%5.11%0.38%1.77%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SSCNX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRLVX has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to SSCNX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCNX dropped -27.49% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

SSCNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSCNX and JRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer