PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCJX vs. JRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSCJX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund (SSCJX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCJX achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 12.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCJX has underperformed JRLVX with an annualized return of 9.72%, while JRLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.


SSCJX

1D
0.37%
1M
3.91%
YTD
9.21%
6M
9.74%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
7.20%
10Y*
9.72%

JRLVX

1D
0.44%
1M
5.08%
YTD
12.32%
6M
13.05%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCJX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSCJX
State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund
9.21%17.89%10.46%16.73%-18.06%11.38%18.07%23.59%-6.86%17.41%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
12.32%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%16.23%25.03%-8.29%17.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCJX and JRLVX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.96

The correlation between SSCJX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSCJX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCJX
SSCJX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SSCJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCJX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCJX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund (SSCJX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSCJXJRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.31

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

14.68

-1.40

SSCJX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCJX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSCJXJRLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.50

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.65

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.71

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.65

+0.06

Drawdowns

SSCJX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCJX drawdown since its inception was -25.66%, smaller than the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCJX and JRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCJXJRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.66%

-32.53%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-8.50%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.55%

-15.27%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

-25.64%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.66%

-32.53%

+6.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-4.56%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.91%

-0.22%

Volatility

SSCJX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund (SSCJX) is 2.80%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that SSCJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSCJXJRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

3.34%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

8.96%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

11.27%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.85%

14.77%

-2.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.49%

15.99%

-3.50%

SSCJX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCJX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSCJX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

SSCJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than JRLVX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.16%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%
SSCJX
State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund
6.34%6.92%5.44%4.03%5.32%5.43%4.54%6.46%4.99%0.55%1.74%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, SSCJX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRLVX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to SSCJX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCJX dropped -25.66% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

SSCJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSCJX and JRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer