PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCJX vs. SSBWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SSCJX vs. SSBWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund (SSCJX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SSCJX vs. SSBWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSCJX
State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund
-2.91%17.89%10.46%16.73%-18.06%11.38%18.07%23.59%-6.86%17.41%
SSBWX
State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund
-2.15%15.92%9.76%15.66%-17.17%10.75%17.27%22.52%-6.23%16.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCJX achieves a -2.91% return, which is significantly lower than SSBWX's -2.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCJX has outperformed SSBWX with an annualized return of 8.69%, while SSBWX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.20% annualized return.


SSCJX

1D
0.14%
1M
-7.04%
YTD
-2.91%
6M
-0.64%
1Y
13.95%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
8.69%

SSBWX

1D
0.22%
1M
-5.86%
YTD
-2.15%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
10.79%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
8.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SSCJX vs. SSBWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSCJX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than SSBWX's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SSCJX vs. SSBWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCJX
SSCJX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SSCJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCJX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SSBWX
SSBWX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SSBWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBWX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBWX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCJX vs. SSBWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund (SSCJX) and State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSCJXSSBWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

1.26

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

1.82

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.54

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.71

7.23

-0.51

SSCJX vs. SSBWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the SSBWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCJX and SSBWX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSCJXSSBWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.26

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.51

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.73

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.65

-0.03

Correlation

The correlation between SSCJX and SSBWX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SSCJX vs. SSBWX - Dividend Comparison

SSCJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, which matches SSBWX's 7.06% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSCJX
State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund
7.13%6.92%5.44%4.03%5.32%5.43%4.54%6.46%4.99%0.55%1.74%2.03%
SSBWX
State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund
7.06%6.91%6.16%4.11%5.78%6.18%4.92%6.65%5.24%0.46%1.75%2.11%

Drawdowns

SSCJX vs. SSBWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCJX drawdown since its inception was -25.66%, which is greater than SSBWX's maximum drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCJX and SSBWX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCJXSSBWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.66%

-23.73%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-7.59%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.20%

-23.73%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.66%

-23.73%

-1.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.22%

-5.99%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-4.22%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.62%

+0.30%

Volatility

SSCJX vs. SSBWX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Target Retirement 2035 Fund (SSCJX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to State Street Target Retirement 2030 Fund (SSBWX) at 3.32%. This indicates that SSCJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSBWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SSCJXSSBWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.32%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.57%

5.53%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.75%

10.00%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.78%

10.62%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.44%

11.31%

+1.13%