PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSCGX vs. ETMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSCGX vs. ETMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSCGX achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly higher than ETMGX's 1.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SSCGX having a 7.41% annualized return and ETMGX not far ahead at 7.56%.


SSCGX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
14.90%
6M
12.38%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*
7.41%

ETMGX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
1.62%
6M
0.06%
1Y
-1.73%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
7.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSCGX vs. ETMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSCGX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund
14.90%4.30%16.63%13.71%-23.11%-9.33%22.69%21.23%-5.23%18.38%
ETMGX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
1.62%-6.63%11.43%11.06%-16.53%20.91%12.33%27.32%-5.86%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SSCGX and ETMGX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.90

The correlation between SSCGX and ETMGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSCGX vs. ETMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSCGX
SSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ETMGX
ETMGX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
ETMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
ETMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSCGX vs. ETMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SSCGXETMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.99

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

-0.16

+2.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

-0.36

+8.91

SSCGX vs. ETMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the ETMGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSCGX and ETMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SSCGXETMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

-0.13

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.04

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.38

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.47

-0.21

Drawdowns

SSCGX vs. ETMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSCGX drawdown since its inception was -71.03%, which is greater than ETMGX's maximum drawdown of -37.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCGX and ETMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSCGXETMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.03%

-37.02%

-34.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-13.14%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.27%

-22.28%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.84%

-25.14%

-21.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

-37.02%

-9.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.80%

-12.90%

+4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.11%

-6.58%

-18.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

5.85%

-2.72%

Volatility

SSCGX vs. ETMGX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (ETMGX) at 4.45%. This indicates that SSCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSCGXETMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

4.45%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.86%

11.19%

+3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.65%

16.08%

+3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.58%

18.75%

+4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.70%

19.92%

+3.78%

SSCGX vs. ETMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SSCGX and ETMGX have an expense ratio of 1.11%.


Dividends

SSCGX vs. ETMGX - Dividend Comparison

SSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, more than ETMGX's 6.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETMGX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
6.93%7.04%2.85%1.36%2.80%8.28%0.09%6.50%7.75%11.87%6.00%5.50%
SSCGX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund
9.11%10.47%7.05%0.00%0.05%1.75%0.00%3.29%17.03%0.34%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSCGX and ETMGX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSCGX has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to ETMGX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSCGX dropped -71.03% vs ETMGX's -37.02%.

SSCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSCGX and ETMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer