SSCGX vs. DMCRX
Compare and contrast key facts about SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX).
SSCGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 20, 1992. DMCRX is managed by Driehaus. It was launched on Nov 18, 2013.
Performance
SSCGX vs. DMCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SSCGX vs. DMCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSCGX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund | -0.80% | 4.30% | 16.63% | 13.71% | -23.11% | -9.33% | 22.69% | 21.23% | -5.23% | 18.38% |
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund | 2.25% | 31.17% | 30.58% | 11.47% | -33.54% | 22.23% | 86.43% | 34.03% | 2.52% | 24.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSCGX achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly lower than DMCRX's 2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SSCGX has underperformed DMCRX with an annualized return of 6.24%, while DMCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.60% annualized return.
SSCGX
- 1D
- 3.93%
- 1M
- -7.20%
- YTD
- -0.80%
- 6M
- -1.25%
- 1Y
- 14.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.91%
- 5Y*
- -2.74%
- 10Y*
- 6.24%
DMCRX
- 1D
- 5.47%
- 1M
- -7.35%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 65.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 20.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SSCGX vs. DMCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSCGX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than DMCRX's 1.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SSCGX vs. DMCRX — Risk / Return Rank
SSCGX
DMCRX
SSCGX vs. DMCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) and Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SSCGX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.64 | 2.06 | -1.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 2.60 | -1.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.34 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 3.73 | -2.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 12.46 | -8.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SSCGX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 2.06 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.16 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.61 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.54 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between SSCGX and DMCRX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SSCGX vs. DMCRX - Dividend Comparison
SSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.55%, less than DMCRX's 13.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSCGX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund | 10.55% | 10.47% | 7.05% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 1.75% | 0.00% | 3.29% | 17.03% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DMCRX Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund | 13.42% | 13.72% | 3.86% | 0.87% | 8.20% | 48.23% | 19.79% | 14.70% | 33.22% | 8.91% | 0.00% | 4.20% |
Drawdowns
SSCGX vs. DMCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSCGX drawdown since its inception was -71.03%, which is greater than DMCRX's maximum drawdown of -59.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSCGX and DMCRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSCGX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.03% | -59.16% | -11.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.09% | -15.46% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.84% | -59.16% | +12.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.84% | -59.16% | +12.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.27% | -10.79% | -10.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.19% | -20.35% | -4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 4.62% | -1.01% |
Volatility
SSCGX vs. DMCRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Small Cap Growth Fund (SSCGX) is 8.87%, while Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund (DMCRX) has a volatility of 12.40%. This indicates that SSCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SSCGX | DMCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.87% | 12.40% | -3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.19% | 23.15% | -7.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.02% | 31.42% | -8.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.53% | 39.55% | -16.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 33.88% | -10.25% |