PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SRVR vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SRVR vs. QQQ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRVR returned -1.65%/yr vs 16.85%/yr for QQQ. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SRVR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

SRVR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 18.64% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 17.57% return.

SRVR

1D
0.42%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
18.64%
6M
17.26%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
-1.65%
10Y*
—

QQQ

1D
0.59%
1M
0.22%
YTD
17.57%
6M
17.85%
1Y
37.55%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
21.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRVR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF		18.64%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%22.31%11.99%41.98%-3.66%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		17.57%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SRVR and QQQ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

0.53

The correlation between SRVR and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SRVR vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SRVR
QQQ

Real Estate

66.4%
0.1%

Industrials

11.7%
2.8%

Communication Services

7.5%
15.8%

Technology

6.8%
53.8%

Energy

3.8%
0.6%

Utilities

2.2%
1.4%

Financial Services

0.9%
0.2%

Basic Materials

0.8%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

SRVR
66.4%
QQQ
0.1%

Industrials

SRVR
11.7%
QQQ
2.8%

Communication Services

SRVR
7.5%
QQQ
15.8%

Technology

SRVR
6.8%
QQQ
53.8%

Energy

SRVR
3.8%
QQQ
0.6%

Utilities

SRVR
2.2%
QQQ
1.4%

Financial Services

SRVR
0.9%
QQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

SRVR
0.8%
QQQ
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SRVR

-

QQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

SRVR

-

QQQ
7.7%

Healthcare

SRVR

-

QQQ
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF

Invesco QQQ ETF

Often compared with SRVR:
SRVR vs. DTCRSRVR vs. VNQSRVR vs. EQIXSRVR vs. INDSSRVR vs. REETSRVR vs. VPNSRVR vs. VRNS
Often compared with QQQ:
QQQ vs. SPYQQQ vs. VOOQQQ vs. VGTQQQ vs. TQQQQQQ vs. SMHQQQ vs. QQQMQQQ vs. QQQI

Return for Risk

SRVR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRVR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SRVRQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.47
2.09

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.77
2.73

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.37

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

3.01

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.17

11.22

-10.05

SRVR vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRVR Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRVR and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SRVR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and QQQ.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SRVRQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.99%

-82.97%

+41.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-11.96%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-22.77%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.99%

-35.12%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.12%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.12%

-3.33%

-9.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.25%

-32.75%

+17.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

3.20%

+3.69%

Volatility

SRVR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) is 6.23%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that SRVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SRVRQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

7.56%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.72%

13.81%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.26%

17.19%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

22.55%

-2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.46%

22.38%

-0.92%

SRVR vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRVR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

SRVR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than QQQ's 0.39% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF		2.57%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SRVR and QQQ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to SRVR (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRVR dropped -40.99% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 16.85% vs -1.65% for SRVR. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 6.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 16.85% return vs -1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SRVR.

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.

SRVR is categorized as REIT, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SRVR and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRVR and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer