SRVR vs. MSTZ
SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. SRVR is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, SRVR returned 0.43% vs 159.07% for MSTZ. Their -0.33 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SRVR charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
SRVR vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRVR achieves a 8.80% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -30.44% return.
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 0.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- -3.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.00%
MSTZ
- 1D
- 8.95%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- 6M
- -24.16%
- YTD
- -30.44%
- 1Y
- 159.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -86.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $101.73M | $133.33M | $177.41M | |
| $1.88M | $2.23M | $2.66M |
SRVR vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 8.80% | -1.99% | -5.37% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -30.44% | -38.95% | -94.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRVR and MSTZ is -0.41, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRVR vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
SRVR
MSTZ
SRVR vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRVR | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.28 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 2.44 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.05 | 4.53 | -4.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRVR vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRVR drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRVR and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRVR | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.99% | -99.38% | +58.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.01% | -84.89% | +69.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.33% | -97.63% | +77.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.30% | -94.63% | +79.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.18% | 45.62% | -39.44% |
Volatility
SRVR vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) is 5.05%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 37.86%. This indicates that SRVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRVR | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 37.86% | -32.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.27% | 134.52% | -120.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 150.23% | -132.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 169.87% | -149.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 169.87% | -148.48% |
SRVR vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRVR has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRVR vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 2.81% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRVR and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (37.86%) compared to SRVR (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRVR dropped -40.99% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 159.07% vs 0.43% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 159.07% return vs 0.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRVR is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
SRVR is categorized as REIT, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for SRVR and 1.05% for MSTZ.
MSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRVR and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer