SRV vs. MPLX
SRV (NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund) is Global Equity Income fund actively managed by NXG, while MPLX (MPLX LP) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SRV returned 11.93%/yr vs 14.99%/yr for MPLX. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SRV vs. MPLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRV achieves a 31.93% return, which is significantly higher than MPLX's 7.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SRV has underperformed MPLX with an annualized return of 11.93%, while MPLX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.99% annualized return.
SRV
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 31.93%
- 6M
- 36.31%
- 1Y
- 41.64%
- 3Y*
- 30.62%
- 5Y*
- 26.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
MPLX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 7.63%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- 1Y
- 15.40%
- 3Y*
- 27.99%
- 5Y*
- 24.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
SRV vs. MPLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 31.93% | 5.05% | 50.70% | 19.88% | 20.11% | 50.45% | -41.65% | 33.99% | -21.61% | -4.21% |
MPLX MPLX LP | 7.63% | 20.54% | 41.72% | 22.46% | 21.09% | 53.92% | -1.79% | -8.25% | -8.43% | 9.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRV and MPLX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2012 | 0.48 |
The correlation between SRV and MPLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.55 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRV vs. MPLX — Risk / Return Rank
SRV
MPLX
SRV vs. MPLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) and MPLX LP (MPLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRV | MPLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.17 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 2.01 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 4.73 | +4.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRV | MPLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 0.99 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 1.26 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.49 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.39 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
SRV vs. MPLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRV drawdown since its inception was -92.93%, which is greater than MPLX's maximum drawdown of -85.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRV and MPLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRV | MPLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.93% | -85.72% | -7.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.13% | -7.71% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.26% | -14.58% | -11.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.26% | -18.46% | -7.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.70% | -75.21% | -6.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.50% | -4.79% | -2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.51% | -30.01% | -18.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.50% | 3.27% | +1.23% |
Volatility
SRV vs. MPLX - Volatility Comparison
NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to MPLX LP (MPLX) at 5.51%. This indicates that SRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRV | MPLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | 5.51% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.13% | 11.65% | +3.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.82% | 15.59% | +3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.43% | 19.40% | +7.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.29% | 30.66% | +7.63% |
Dividends
SRV vs. MPLX - Dividend Comparison
SRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.39%, more than MPLX's 7.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPLX MPLX LP | 7.58% | 7.39% | 7.33% | 8.65% | 8.80% | 11.30% | 12.70% | 10.41% | 8.22% | 6.23% | 5.86% | 4.33% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 15.39% | 19.31% | 12.85% | 15.56% | 8.85% | 4.72% | 12.05% | 10.59% | 12.73% | 9.07% | 7.95% | 11.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRV and MPLX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRV has higher volatility (7.55%) compared to MPLX (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRV dropped -92.93% vs MPLX's -85.72%.
SRV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRV and MPLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer