SRUUF vs. EG
SRUUF (Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund) is Commodities fund actively managed by Sprott, while EG (Everest Group Ltd) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SRUUF returned 14.65%/yr vs -0.56%/yr for EG. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SRUUF vs. EG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRUUF achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly higher than EG's -5.67% return.
SRUUF
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EG
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -8.46%
- YTD
- -5.67%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- -7.74%
- 3Y*
- -0.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.37%
SRUUF vs. EG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRUUF Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund | 0.93% | 12.66% | -18.89% | 82.09% | 7.65% | 17.26% |
EG Everest Group Ltd | -5.67% | -4.14% | 4.59% | 8.69% | 23.74% | 14.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRUUF and EG is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2021 | 0.11 |
The correlation between SRUUF and EG shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRUUF vs. EG — Risk / Return Rank
SRUUF
EG
SRUUF vs. EG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) and Everest Group Ltd (EG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRUUF | EG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.96 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | -0.47 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.86 | -1.03 | +2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRUUF | EG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | -0.34 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.38 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
SRUUF vs. EG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRUUF drawdown since its inception was -48.68%, smaller than the maximum EG drawdown of -52.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRUUF and EG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRUUF | EG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.68% | -52.97% | +4.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.98% | -16.43% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.68% | -23.39% | -25.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.59% | -19.06% | -2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.79% | -12.14% | -9.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.29% | 7.67% | +3.62% |
Volatility
SRUUF vs. EG - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (SRUUF) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to Everest Group Ltd (EG) at 5.43%. This indicates that SRUUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRUUF | EG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.75% | 5.43% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.53% | 14.11% | +10.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.51% | 23.08% | +11.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.81% | 25.77% | +16.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.81% | 27.23% | +14.58% |
Dividends
SRUUF vs. EG - Dividend Comparison
SRUUF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EG Everest Group Ltd | 1.89% | 2.36% | 2.14% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 2.26% | 2.65% | 2.08% | 2.43% | 2.28% | 2.17% | 2.18% |
SRUUF Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRUUF and EG have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRUUF has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to EG (5.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRUUF dropped -48.68% vs EG's -52.97%.
SRUUF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRUUF and EG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer