PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EG vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EG and QQQ is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

EG vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Everest Group Ltd (EG) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.56%
3.81%
EG
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EG:

0.08

QQQ:

1.69

Sortino Ratio

EG:

0.26

QQQ:

2.25

Omega Ratio

EG:

1.04

QQQ:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

EG:

0.13

QQQ:

2.26

Martin Ratio

EG:

0.32

QQQ:

8.06

Ulcer Index

EG:

6.08%

QQQ:

3.80%

Daily Std Dev

EG:

24.38%

QQQ:

18.07%

Max Drawdown

EG:

-52.96%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

EG:

-8.38%

QQQ:

-4.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EG achieves a 2.36% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, EG has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.53%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.49% annualized return.


EG

YTD

2.36%

1M

-0.10%

6M

0.56%

1Y

1.62%

5Y*

8.53%

10Y*

10.53%

QQQ

YTD

0.77%

1M

-1.99%

6M

3.81%

1Y

27.98%

5Y*

19.49%

10Y*

18.49%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EG vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EG is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EG is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EG is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EG is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EG is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EG is 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EG vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everest Group Ltd (EG) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EG, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.081.69
The chart of Sortino ratio for EG, currently valued at 0.26, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.262.25
The chart of Omega ratio for EG, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.041.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for EG, currently valued at 0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.132.26
The chart of Martin ratio for EG, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.000.328.06
EG
QQQ

The current EG Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EG and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.08
1.69
EG
QQQ

Dividends

EG vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

EG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than QQQ's 0.55% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EG
Everest Group Ltd
2.09%2.14%1.92%1.96%2.26%2.65%2.08%2.43%2.28%2.17%2.18%1.88%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.55%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

EG vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EG drawdown since its inception was -52.96%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EG and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-8.38%
-4.12%
EG
QQQ

Volatility

EG vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Everest Group Ltd (EG) is 5.07%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that EG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
5.07%
6.20%
EG
QQQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab