PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EG vs. CET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EG vs. CET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Everest Group Ltd (EG) and Central Securities Corporation (CET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EG achieves a 11.61% return, which is significantly higher than CET's 6.01% return. Over the past 10 years, EG has underperformed CET with an annualized return of 9.49%, while CET has yielded a comparatively higher 16.33% annualized return.


EG

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.75%
6M
14.33%
YTD
11.61%
1Y
15.71%
3Y*
3.58%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*
9.49%
ALL TIME*
11.97%

CET

1D
1.98%
1M
1.40%
6M
3.18%
YTD
6.01%
1Y
17.64%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
16.33%
ALL TIME*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.60M$1.89M$1.91M
$160.37M$141.62M$144.70M

EG vs. CET - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EG
Everest Group Ltd
11.61%-4.14%4.59%8.69%23.74%19.80%-13.03%30.17%0.73%4.43%
CET
Central Securities Corporation
6.01%17.20%26.82%19.17%-19.68%49.00%4.99%38.61%-4.49%30.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EG and CET is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 1995

0.32

The correlation between EG and CET shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EG:

$14.81B

CET:

$1.58B

EPS

EG:

$61.93

CET:

$19.05

PE Ratio

EG:

6.04

CET:

2.80

PEG Ratio

EG:

0.11

CET:

0.03

PS Ratio

EG:

0.69

CET:

9.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

EG:

$16.71B

CET:

$160.68M

Gross Profit (TTM)

EG:

$3.83B

CET:

$103.20M

EBITDA (TTM)

EG:

$1.70B

CET:

$553.54M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EG vs. CET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EG
EG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
EG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
EG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

CET
CET Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CET Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CET Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CET Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CET Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EG vs. CET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Everest Group Ltd (EG) and Central Securities Corporation (CET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EGCETDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.23

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

1.99

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.88

7.41

-5.53

EG vs. CET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EG Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the CET Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EG and CET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EG vs. CET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EG drawdown since its inception was -52.97%, smaller than the maximum CET drawdown of -56.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EG and CET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EGCETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.97%

-56.69%

+3.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.43%

-8.08%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

-15.42%

-7.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.39%

-24.89%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.21%

-39.91%

-4.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.16%

-0.58%

-5.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-10.13%

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.57%

2.16%

+5.41%

Volatility

EG vs. CET - Volatility Comparison

Everest Group Ltd (EG) has a higher volatility of 8.77% compared to Central Securities Corporation (CET) at 3.39%. This indicates that EG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EGCETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.77%

3.39%

+5.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.14%

9.29%

+6.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.40%

12.07%

+12.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.80%

14.58%

+11.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.32%

16.62%

+10.70%

Dividends

EG vs. CET - Dividend Comparison

EG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than CET's 5.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CET
Central Securities Corporation
5.16%5.32%4.92%4.90%7.34%8.41%5.68%3.78%5.84%3.65%4.50%10.41%
EG
Everest Group Ltd
2.14%2.36%2.14%1.92%1.96%2.26%2.65%2.08%2.43%2.28%2.17%2.18%

Financials

EG vs. CET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Everest Group Ltd and Central Securities Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EG and CET have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EG has higher volatility (8.77%) compared to CET (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EG dropped -52.97% vs CET's -56.69%.

CET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EG and CET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer