PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRU-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SRU-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) and Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRU-UN.TO achieves a 15.56% return, which is significantly higher than AP-UN.TO's -24.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SRU-UN.TO has outperformed AP-UN.TO with an annualized return of 4.73%, while AP-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -6.82% annualized return.


SRU-UN.TO

1D
0.38%
1M
1.44%
YTD
15.56%
6M
18.65%
1Y
20.29%
3Y*
12.34%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
4.73%

AP-UN.TO

1D
0.41%
1M
1.73%
YTD
-24.24%
6M
-21.00%
1Y
-32.57%
3Y*
-15.90%
5Y*
-19.84%
10Y*
-6.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRU-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRU-UN.TO
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust
15.56%13.10%6.13%0.16%-11.27%48.64%-19.65%6.97%5.77%1.14%
AP-UN.TO
Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
-24.24%-13.47%-5.92%-12.14%-38.62%20.95%-24.39%21.30%9.29%21.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SRU-UN.TO and AP-UN.TO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2003

0.41

The correlation between SRU-UN.TO and AP-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$2.10

AP-UN.TO:

-CA$13.04

PS Ratio

SRU-UN.TO:

5.40

AP-UN.TO:

1.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$929.78M

AP-UN.TO:

CA$585.67M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$565.49M

AP-UN.TO:

CA$302.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$628.59M

AP-UN.TO:

-CA$1.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRU-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRU-UN.TO
SRU-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SRU-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AP-UN.TO
AP-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRU-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) and Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRU-UN.TOAP-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.85

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

-0.55

+3.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.46

-0.89

+10.35

SRU-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRU-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the AP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRU-UN.TO and AP-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRU-UN.TOAP-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86

-0.76

+2.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

-0.66

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

-0.25

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.25

+0.10

Drawdowns

SRU-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRU-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -68.25%, smaller than the maximum AP-UN.TO drawdown of -76.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRU-UN.TO and AP-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRU-UN.TOAP-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.25%

-76.72%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-58.74%

+52.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.34%

-58.74%

+44.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.89%

-73.59%

+44.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.78%

-76.72%

+21.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-73.67%

+73.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.98%

-17.38%

+6.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

36.63%

-34.41%

Volatility

SRU-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) is 3.08%, while Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that SRU-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AP-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRU-UN.TOAP-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.08%

5.23%

-2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

38.30%

-30.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.30%

42.94%

-31.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

30.41%

-14.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.54%

27.49%

-5.95%

Dividends

SRU-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

SRU-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, less than AP-UN.TO's 12.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AP-UN.TO
Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
12.80%12.79%10.50%11.30%6.84%3.88%4.38%3.07%3.53%3.65%4.18%4.65%
SRU-UN.TO
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust
6.39%7.18%7.56%7.42%6.90%5.74%8.01%5.81%5.72%5.55%5.17%5.34%

Financials

SRU-UN.TO vs. AP-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust and Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
231.84M
143.93M
(SRU-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(AP-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SRU-UN.TO and AP-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRU-UN.TO and AP-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer