AP-UN.TO vs. NWH-UN.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO) and NorthWest Healthcare Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (NWH-UN.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AP-UN.TO or NWH-UN.TO.
Correlation
The correlation between AP-UN.TO and NWH-UN.TO is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AP-UN.TO vs. NWH-UN.TO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AP-UN.TO:
-0.14
NWH-UN.TO:
0.13
AP-UN.TO:
-0.03
NWH-UN.TO:
0.43
AP-UN.TO:
1.00
NWH-UN.TO:
1.05
AP-UN.TO:
-0.06
NWH-UN.TO:
0.06
AP-UN.TO:
-0.32
NWH-UN.TO:
0.31
AP-UN.TO:
11.69%
NWH-UN.TO:
12.04%
AP-UN.TO:
25.66%
NWH-UN.TO:
26.20%
AP-UN.TO:
-69.58%
NWH-UN.TO:
-68.54%
AP-UN.TO:
-64.18%
NWH-UN.TO:
-56.43%
Fundamentals
AP-UN.TO:
CA$2.04B
NWH-UN.TO:
CA$1.23B
AP-UN.TO:
-CA$3.09
NWH-UN.TO:
-CA$1.21
AP-UN.TO:
0.00
NWH-UN.TO:
0.00
AP-UN.TO:
3.40
NWH-UN.TO:
2.64
AP-UN.TO:
0.38
NWH-UN.TO:
0.76
AP-UN.TO:
CA$599.10M
NWH-UN.TO:
CA$322.28M
AP-UN.TO:
CA$330.86M
NWH-UN.TO:
CA$246.71M
AP-UN.TO:
CA$67.53M
NWH-UN.TO:
-CA$60.09M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AP-UN.TO achieves a -10.83% return, which is significantly lower than NWH-UN.TO's 12.19% return. Over the past 10 years, AP-UN.TO has underperformed NWH-UN.TO with an annualized return of -3.81%, while NWH-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 1.67% annualized return.
AP-UN.TO
-10.83%
2.85%
-16.93%
-3.60%
-12.79%
-3.81%
NWH-UN.TO
12.19%
7.46%
-1.03%
3.31%
-6.35%
1.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AP-UN.TO vs. NWH-UN.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AP-UN.TO
NWH-UN.TO
AP-UN.TO vs. NWH-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO) and NorthWest Healthcare Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (NWH-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AP-UN.TO vs. NWH-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison
AP-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.20%, more than NWH-UN.TO's 7.39% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AP-UN.TO Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust | 12.20% | 10.50% | 11.30% | 6.83% | 3.87% | 4.36% | 3.07% | 3.53% | 3.64% | 4.18% | 4.63% | 4.05% |
NWH-UN.TO NorthWest Healthcare Properties Real Estate Investment Trust | 7.39% | 8.09% | 12.98% | 8.42% | 5.79% | 6.35% | 6.71% | 8.44% | 7.04% | 7.84% | 8.96% | 8.62% |
Drawdowns
AP-UN.TO vs. NWH-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AP-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -69.58%, roughly equal to the maximum NWH-UN.TO drawdown of -68.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AP-UN.TO and NWH-UN.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AP-UN.TO vs. NWH-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to NorthWest Healthcare Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (NWH-UN.TO) at 9.40%. This indicates that AP-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWH-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AP-UN.TO vs. NWH-UN.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust and NorthWest Healthcare Properties Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AP-UN.TO vs. NWH-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison
AP-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 81.24M and revenue of 150.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.9%.
NWH-UN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NorthWest Healthcare Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 77.76M and revenue of 102.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.7%.
AP-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 74.15M and revenue of 150.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.2%.
NWH-UN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NorthWest Healthcare Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 68.43M and revenue of 102.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 66.6%.
AP-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of -107.66M and revenue of 150.64M, resulting in a net margin of -71.5%.
NWH-UN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, NorthWest Healthcare Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 8.47M and revenue of 102.70M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.