PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AP-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

AP-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO) and Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AP-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AP-UN.TO
Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
-30.38%-13.47%-5.92%-12.14%-38.62%20.95%-24.39%21.30%9.29%21.85%
CAR-UN.TO
Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
-1.11%-10.17%-6.48%19.26%-26.56%22.96%-2.97%22.93%22.52%23.53%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AP-UN.TO:

CA$1.28B

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$5.68B

EPS

AP-UN.TO:

-CA$9.50

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$1.24

PS Ratio

AP-UN.TO:

2.16

CAR-UN.TO:

5.72

PB Ratio

AP-UN.TO:

0.32

CAR-UN.TO:

0.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

AP-UN.TO:

CA$592.38M

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$1.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AP-UN.TO:

CA$313.21M

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$593.74M

EBITDA (TTM)

AP-UN.TO:

-CA$1.19B

CAR-UN.TO:

CA$480.34M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AP-UN.TO achieves a -30.38% return, which is significantly lower than CAR-UN.TO's -1.11% return. Over the past 10 years, AP-UN.TO has underperformed CAR-UN.TO with an annualized return of -7.09%, while CAR-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 6.10% annualized return.


AP-UN.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
-30.38%
6M
-54.18%
1Y
-39.94%
3Y*
-19.86%
5Y*
-19.43%
10Y*
-7.09%

CAR-UN.TO

1D
1.61%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
-1.11%
6M
-9.08%
1Y
-12.23%
3Y*
-3.99%
5Y*
-3.88%
10Y*
6.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AP-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AP-UN.TO
AP-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
AP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AP-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

CAR-UN.TO
CAR-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CAR-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAR-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAR-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CAR-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAR-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AP-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO) and Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AP-UN.TOCAR-UN.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.92

-0.63

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.02

-0.78

-0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.91

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.66

-0.61

-0.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.31

-1.06

-0.25

AP-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the CAR-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AP-UN.TO and CAR-UN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AP-UN.TOCAR-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.92

-0.63

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.65

-0.19

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.26

0.29

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.35

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between AP-UN.TO and CAR-UN.TO is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AP-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

AP-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.74%, more than CAR-UN.TO's 4.30% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AP-UN.TO
Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
15.74%12.79%10.50%11.30%6.84%3.88%4.38%3.07%3.53%3.65%4.18%4.65%
CAR-UN.TO
Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
4.30%4.19%7.00%4.12%3.40%2.35%2.76%2.59%2.96%3.42%3.95%4.50%

Drawdowns

AP-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AP-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.72%, which is greater than CAR-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -65.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AP-UN.TO and CAR-UN.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AP-UN.TOCAR-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.72%

-65.08%

-11.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.74%

-21.37%

-37.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.59%

-34.95%

-38.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.72%

-38.20%

-38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.80%

-29.84%

-45.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.95%

-9.17%

-7.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.45%

12.34%

+17.11%

Volatility

AP-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (AP-UN.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CAR-UN.TO) at 4.49%. This indicates that AP-UN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAR-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AP-UN.TOCAR-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.74%

4.49%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.50%

12.21%

+31.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.83%

19.57%

+24.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.16%

21.04%

+9.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.33%

21.03%

+6.30%

Financials

AP-UN.TO vs. CAR-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allied Properties Real Estate Investment Trust and Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
148.77M
243.30M
(AP-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(CAR-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items