PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRU-UN.TO vs. CHP-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

SRU-UN.TO vs. CHP-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) and Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CHP-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SRU-UN.TO vs. CHP-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRU-UN.TO
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust
6.74%13.10%6.13%0.16%-11.27%48.64%-19.65%6.97%5.77%1.14%
CHP-UN.TO
Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
6.93%17.01%1.12%-0.12%2.41%23.04%-1.63%27.47%-8.19%4.58%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$4.92B

CHP-UN.TO:

CA$11.32B

EPS

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$1.44

CHP-UN.TO:

-CA$0.08

PS Ratio

SRU-UN.TO:

5.08

CHP-UN.TO:

7.99

PB Ratio

SRU-UN.TO:

0.94

CHP-UN.TO:

2.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$927.28M

CHP-UN.TO:

CA$1.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$564.58M

CHP-UN.TO:

CA$1.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

SRU-UN.TO:

CA$486.20M

CHP-UN.TO:

CA$425.05M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SRU-UN.TO having a 6.74% return and CHP-UN.TO slightly higher at 6.93%. Over the past 10 years, SRU-UN.TO has underperformed CHP-UN.TO with an annualized return of 4.40%, while CHP-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.94% annualized return.


SRU-UN.TO

1D
1.43%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
6.74%
6M
4.42%
1Y
13.69%
3Y*
8.34%
5Y*
7.30%
10Y*
4.40%

CHP-UN.TO

1D
1.82%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
6.93%
6M
8.98%
1Y
16.48%
3Y*
8.24%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
7.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRU-UN.TO vs. CHP-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRU-UN.TO
SRU-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SRU-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRU-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

CHP-UN.TO
CHP-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CHP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHP-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHP-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CHP-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHP-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRU-UN.TO vs. CHP-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) and Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CHP-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRU-UN.TOCHP-UN.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

1.10

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

1.68

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.19

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

2.93

-0.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.20

7.07

-0.88

SRU-UN.TO vs. CHP-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRU-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the CHP-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRU-UN.TO and CHP-UN.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRU-UN.TOCHP-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

1.10

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.51

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.45

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.57

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between SRU-UN.TO and CHP-UN.TO is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SRU-UN.TO vs. CHP-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

SRU-UN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, more than CHP-UN.TO's 4.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SRU-UN.TO
SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust
6.84%7.18%7.56%7.42%6.90%5.74%8.01%5.81%5.72%5.55%5.17%5.34%
CHP-UN.TO
Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
4.92%5.17%5.66%5.41%5.04%4.90%5.75%5.35%6.46%5.48%5.12%5.49%

Drawdowns

SRU-UN.TO vs. CHP-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRU-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -68.25%, which is greater than CHP-UN.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRU-UN.TO and CHP-UN.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SRU-UN.TOCHP-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.25%

-28.85%

-39.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-6.17%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.89%

-21.32%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.78%

-28.85%

-25.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-1.13%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.06%

-5.41%

-5.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.55%

-0.19%

Volatility

SRU-UN.TO vs. CHP-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust (SRU-UN.TO) is 3.81%, while Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CHP-UN.TO) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that SRU-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHP-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SRU-UN.TOCHP-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

4.90%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.51%

9.97%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

15.07%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

16.48%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

17.77%

+3.80%

Financials

SRU-UN.TO vs. CHP-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust and Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
247.54M
355.66M
(SRU-UN.TO) Total Revenue
(CHP-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

SRU-UN.TO vs. CHP-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust and Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
58.6%
71.6%
Portfolio components
SRU-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 145.12M and revenue of 247.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.6%.

CHP-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 254.54M and revenue of 355.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.6%.

SRU-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 131.22M and revenue of 247.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.0%.

CHP-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 105.68M and revenue of 355.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.7%.

SRU-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SmartCentres Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 105.50M and revenue of 247.54M, resulting in a net margin of 42.6%.

CHP-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of -53.36M and revenue of 355.66M, resulting in a net margin of -15.0%.