SRTS vs. SLV
SRTS (Sensus Healthcare, Inc.) is a stock, while SLV (iShares Silver Trust) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Over the past 5 years, SRTS returned -4.01%/yr vs 21.04%/yr for SLV. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SRTS vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRTS achieves a -29.15% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 3.97% return.
SRTS
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -28.24%
- YTD
- -29.15%
- 6M
- -29.85%
- 1Y
- -42.33%
- 3Y*
- 1.97%
- 5Y*
- -4.01%
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 29.40%
- 1Y
- 113.72%
- 3Y*
- 45.73%
- 5Y*
- 21.04%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
SRTS vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRTS Sensus Healthcare, Inc. | -29.15% | -42.49% | 193.22% | -68.19% | 2.77% | 87.05% | 9.04% | -52.23% | 43.60% | -1.71% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 3.97% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRTS and SLV is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2016 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRTS vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
SRTS
SLV
SRTS vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRTS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.36 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 2.69 | -3.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 5.76 | -7.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRTS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 1.94 | -2.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.58 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.25 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
SRTS vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRTS drawdown since its inception was -87.51%, which is greater than SLV's maximum drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRTS and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRTS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.51% | -76.28% | -11.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.09% | -42.45% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.63% | -42.45% | -26.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.51% | -42.45% | -45.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.16% | -36.57% | -44.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.61% | -44.67% | -1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.64% | 19.81% | +10.83% |
Volatility
SRTS vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) has a higher volatility of 33.15% compared to iShares Silver Trust (SLV) at 16.34%. This indicates that SRTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRTS | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.15% | 16.34% | +16.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.33% | 58.31% | -5.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.15% | 58.90% | +17.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.24% | 36.15% | +46.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.55% | 31.83% | +41.72% |
Dividends
SRTS vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
Neither SRTS nor SLV has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SRTS and SLV have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRTS has higher volatility (33.15%) compared to SLV (16.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRTS dropped -87.51% vs SLV's -76.28%.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRTS and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer