PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRTS vs. ASC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SRTS vs. ASC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) and Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRTS achieves a -28.64% return, which is significantly lower than ASC's 57.44% return.


SRTS

1D
-0.35%
1M
-28.64%
YTD
-28.64%
6M
-30.05%
1Y
-39.83%
3Y*
1.70%
5Y*
-4.04%
10Y*

ASC

1D
-1.28%
1M
-8.61%
YTD
57.44%
6M
37.91%
1Y
75.06%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
35.04%
10Y*
7.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRTS vs. ASC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRTS
Sensus Healthcare, Inc.
-28.64%-42.49%193.22%-68.19%2.77%87.05%9.04%-52.23%43.60%-1.71%
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
57.44%-10.36%-8.18%5.81%326.33%3.36%-63.57%93.79%-41.63%8.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SRTS and ASC is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2016

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SRTS:

$46.75M

ASC:

$661.48M

EPS

SRTS:

-$0.48

ASC:

$1.43

PS Ratio

SRTS:

2.06

ASC:

2.04

PB Ratio

SRTS:

1.03

ASC:

1.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

SRTS:

$22.53M

ASC:

$324.12M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SRTS:

$8.51M

ASC:

$100.44M

EBITDA (TTM)

SRTS:

-$8.57M

ASC:

$105.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRTS vs. ASC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRTS
SRTS Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SRTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRTS Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SRTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRTS Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

ASC
ASC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ASC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASC Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ASC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASC Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRTS vs. ASC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) and Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRTSASCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.52

2.09

-2.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.35

2.80

-3.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.32

-0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.81

3.46

-4.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.33

8.84

-10.17

SRTS vs. ASC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRTS Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the ASC Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRTS and ASC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRTSASCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.52

2.09

-2.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

0.77

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.09

-0.19

Drawdowns

SRTS vs. ASC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRTS drawdown since its inception was -87.51%, which is greater than ASC's maximum drawdown of -80.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRTS and ASC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRTSASCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.51%

-80.11%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.73%

-21.96%

-27.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-68.41%

-61.41%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.51%

-61.41%

-26.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.03%

-22.92%

-58.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.58%

-39.00%

-7.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.32%

8.60%

+21.72%

Volatility

SRTS vs. ASC - Volatility Comparison

Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) has a higher volatility of 33.13% compared to Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) at 11.85%. This indicates that SRTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRTSASCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.13%

11.85%

+21.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.54%

26.96%

+25.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.19%

36.10%

+40.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.24%

45.96%

+36.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.58%

51.41%

+22.17%

Dividends

SRTS vs. ASC - Dividend Comparison

SRTS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
4.01%2.83%8.89%8.16%0.00%0.00%1.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.41%4.80%
SRTS
Sensus Healthcare, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SRTS vs. ASC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sensus Healthcare, Inc. and Ardmore Shipping Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
3.39M
87.92M
(SRTS) Total Revenue
(ASC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SRTS and ASC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRTS has higher volatility (33.13%) compared to ASC (11.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRTS dropped -87.51% vs ASC's -80.11%.

ASC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRTS and ASC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer