SRTS vs. AMZN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SRTS (Sensus Healthcare, Inc.) and AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) are both stocks. SRTS operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while AMZN operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, SRTS returned -3.87%/yr vs 9.30%/yr for AMZN. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SRTS vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRTS achieves a -28.64% return, which is significantly lower than AMZN's 8.32% return.

SRTS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -28.28%
• YTD: -28.64%
• 6M: -29.18%
• 1Y: -41.20%
• 3Y*: 1.70%
• 5Y*: -3.87%
• 10Y*: —

AMZN

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: -8.10%
• YTD: 8.32%
• 6M: 7.59%
• 1Y: 21.54%
• 3Y*: 26.25%
• 5Y*: 9.30%
• 10Y*: 21.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRTS vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SRTS Sensus Healthcare, Inc.	-28.64%	-42.49%	193.22%	-68.19%	2.77%	87.05%	9.04%	-52.23%	43.60%	-1.71%
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc	8.32%	5.21%	44.39%	80.88%	-49.62%	2.38%	76.26%	23.03%	28.43%	55.96%

Correlation

The correlation between SRTS and AMZN is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2016	0.16

The correlation between SRTS and AMZN shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap SRTS : $46.75M AMZN : $2.72T
EPS SRTS : -$0.48 AMZN : $8.37
PS Ratio SRTS : 2.06 AMZN : 3.65
PB Ratio SRTS : 1.03 AMZN : 6.15
Total Revenue (TTM) SRTS : $22.53M AMZN : $742.78B
Gross Profit (TTM) SRTS : $8.51M AMZN : $348.59B
EBITDA (TTM) SRTS : -$8.57M AMZN : $152.71B

Return for Risk

SRTS vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRTS

SRTS Risk / Return Rank: 16
SRTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
SRTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
SRTS Omega Ratio Rank: 20
SRTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
SRTS Martin Ratio Rank: 9

AMZN

AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 60
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 56
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRTS vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SRTS	AMZN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.54	0.72	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.39	1.18	-1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.15	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	1.00	-1.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.35	2.39	-3.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SRTS vs. AMZN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRTS Sharpe Ratio is -0.54, which is lower than the AMZN Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRTS and AMZN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SRTS	AMZN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.54	0.72	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05	0.26	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	0.57	-0.66

Drawdowns

SRTS vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRTS drawdown since its inception was -87.51%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRTS and AMZN.

Drawdown Indicators

	SRTS	AMZN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.51%	-94.40%	+6.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.73%	-21.74%	-27.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.41%	-30.88%	-37.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.51%	-56.15%	-31.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.03%	-9.08%	-71.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-46.60%	-28.12%	-18.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.48%	9.02%	+21.46%

Volatility

SRTS vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison

Sensus Healthcare, Inc. (SRTS) has a higher volatility of 33.15% compared to Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) at 7.24%. This indicates that SRTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SRTS	AMZN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	33.15%	7.24%	+25.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.36%	20.35%	+32.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.19%	30.00%	+46.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	82.24%	35.50%	+46.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.57%	32.46%	+41.11%

Dividends

SRTS vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison

Neither SRTS nor AMZN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SRTS and AMZN in my portfolio?

SRTS and AMZN have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SRTS or AMZN?

SRTS has higher volatility (33.15%) compared to AMZN (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRTS dropped -87.51% vs AMZN's -94.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMZN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.