SRS vs. NETL
SRS (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) and NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - SRS tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%) while NETL tracks the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRS returned -5.84%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for NETL. At a correlation of -0.85, they often move in opposite directions. SRS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NETL.
Performance
SRS vs. NETL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRS achieves a -14.05% return, which is significantly lower than NETL's 10.34% return.
SRS
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- -14.05%
- 6M
- -12.14%
- 1Y
- -9.76%
- 3Y*
- -12.75%
- 5Y*
- -5.84%
- 10Y*
- -16.52%
NETL
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 11.59%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
SRS vs. NETL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | -14.05% | -1.45% | -3.55% | -18.78% | 54.68% | -52.22% | -33.05% | -18.90% |
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 10.34% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 2.69% | -16.16% | 27.36% | -0.73% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRS and NETL is -0.73, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | -0.86 |
The correlation between SRS and NETL shifts across timeframes, from -0.85 (all time) to -0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SRS vs. NETL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRS
NETL
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SRS
NETL
-
Basic Materials
SRS
-
NETL
-
Communication Services
SRS
-
NETL
-
Consumer Cyclical
SRS
-
NETL
-
Consumer Defensive
SRS
-
NETL
-
Energy
SRS
-
NETL
-
Healthcare
SRS
-
NETL
-
Industrials
SRS
-
NETL
-
Real Estate
SRS
-
NETL
Technology
SRS
-
NETL
-
Utilities
SRS
-
NETL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRS vs. NETL — Risk / Return Rank
SRS
NETL
SRS vs. NETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRS | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.15 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 1.27 | -1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 3.99 | -5.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRS | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | 0.86 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.07 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.50 | 0.20 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
SRS vs. NETL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than NETL's maximum drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and NETL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRS | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -51.48% | -48.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.53% | -9.16% | -11.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.56% | -19.30% | -32.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.56% | -30.74% | -20.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -3.68% | -96.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.23% | -11.65% | -79.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 2.91% | +6.17% |
Volatility
SRS vs. NETL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) at 3.66%. This indicates that SRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRS | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 3.66% | +3.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.34% | 9.66% | +9.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.06% | 13.57% | +13.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.58% | 17.94% | +19.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.67% | 25.92% | +14.75% |
SRS vs. NETL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NETL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRS vs. NETL - Dividend Comparison
SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than NETL's 4.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.83% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% | 0.00% |
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | 3.67% | 3.61% | 6.06% | 4.49% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.80% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRS and NETL have a correlation of -0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRS has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to NETL (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRS dropped -99.96% vs NETL's -51.48%.
On 5-year performance, NETL leads with 1.33% vs -5.84% for SRS. On fees, NETL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, NETL has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NETL has performed better with a 1.33% return vs -5.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NETL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRS.
NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 3.67% for SRS.
SRS tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRS and 0.60% for NETL.
NETL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRS and NETL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer