PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SRS vs. INKM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SRS vs. INKM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SRS (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) and INKM (SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRS is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while INKM is a Global Equities fund actively managed by State Street. SRS is passively managed, while INKM is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRS returned -16.52%/yr vs 5.59%/yr for INKM. At a correlation of -0.71, they often move in opposite directions. SRS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for INKM.

Performance

SRS vs. INKM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRS achieves a -14.05% return, which is significantly lower than INKM's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, SRS has underperformed INKM with an annualized return of -16.52%, while INKM has yielded a comparatively higher 5.59% annualized return.

SRS

1D
-0.27%
1M
2.82%
YTD
-14.05%
6M
-12.14%
1Y
-9.76%
3Y*
-12.75%
5Y*
-5.84%
10Y*
-16.52%

INKM

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.93%
YTD
5.61%
6M
5.74%
1Y
13.00%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
5.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRS vs. INKM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRS
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate		-14.05%-1.45%-3.55%-18.78%54.68%-52.22%-33.05%-38.97%6.01%-18.03%
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF		5.61%11.86%5.70%10.26%-12.58%8.52%3.11%17.12%-5.32%13.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SRS and INKM is -0.69, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2012

-0.71

The correlation between SRS and INKM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.75 to -0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

SRS vs. INKM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SRS
INKM

Financial Services

71.8%
8.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Communication Services

-

6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.6%

Energy

-

11.1%

Healthcare

-

6.8%

Industrials

-

14.6%

Real Estate

-

10.9%

Technology

-

13.2%

Utilities

-

13.9%

Financial Services

SRS
71.8%
INKM
8.3%

Basic Materials

SRS

-

INKM
1.4%

Communication Services

SRS

-

INKM
6.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SRS

-

INKM
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

SRS

-

INKM
8.6%

Energy

SRS

-

INKM
11.1%

Healthcare

SRS

-

INKM
6.8%

Industrials

SRS

-

INKM
14.6%

Real Estate

SRS

-

INKM
10.9%

Technology

SRS

-

INKM
13.2%

Utilities

SRS

-

INKM
13.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares UltraShort Real Estate

SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF

Often compared with SRS:
SRS vs. DRVSRS vs. REKSRS vs. SPYSRS vs. SPMOSRS vs. VNQSRS vs. ARCCSRS vs. DESK
Often compared with INKM:
INKM vs. INCMINKM vs. GALINKM vs. AOAINKM vs. CEFSINKM vs. VOOINKM vs. SPHYINKM vs. DIVO

Return for Risk

SRS vs. INKM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SRS
SRS Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
SRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
SRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRS Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
INKM
INKM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
INKM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INKM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
INKM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
INKM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
INKM Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRS vs. INKM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SRSINKMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.36
2.20

-2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.36
3.12

-3.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.42

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

2.87

-3.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

11.30

-12.38

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SRS vs. INKM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the INKM Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRS and INKM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SRSINKMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

2.20

-2.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.48

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.41

0.57

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.50

0.57

-1.07

Drawdowns

SRS vs. INKM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than INKM's maximum drawdown of -28.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and INKM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SRSINKMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.96%

-28.58%

-71.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.53%

-4.55%

-15.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.56%

-9.25%

-42.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.56%

-19.18%

-32.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.82%

-28.58%

-57.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.96%

-0.33%

-99.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.23%

-3.69%

-87.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.08%

1.15%

+7.93%

Volatility

SRS vs. INKM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (INKM) at 1.67%. This indicates that SRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INKM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SRSINKMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.58%

1.67%

+5.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.34%

4.59%

+14.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.06%

5.95%

+21.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.58%

8.30%

+29.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.67%

9.78%

+30.89%

SRS vs. INKM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than INKM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

SRS vs. INKM - Dividend Comparison

SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than INKM's 4.86% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INKM
SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF		4.86%5.82%4.83%4.56%5.03%3.74%3.88%4.38%4.08%3.10%3.39%3.45%
SRS
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate		3.67%3.61%6.06%4.49%0.30%0.00%0.19%1.80%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SRS and INKM have a correlation of -0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRS has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to INKM (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRS dropped -99.96% vs INKM's -28.58%.

On 10-year performance, INKM leads with 5.59% vs -16.52% for SRS. On fees, INKM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, INKM has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, INKM has performed better with a 5.59% return vs -16.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

INKM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRS.

INKM has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 3.67% for SRS.

SRS is categorized as REIT, while INKM is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRS and 0.50% for INKM.

INKM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRS and INKM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer