SRS vs. FDV
SRS (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) and FDV (Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRS is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while FDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Federated. SRS is passively managed, while FDV is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.85, they often move in opposite directions. SRS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FDV.
Performance
SRS vs. FDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SRS
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 2.10%
- 6M
- -16.79%
- YTD
- -19.00%
- 1Y
- -13.31%
- 3Y*
- -11.13%
- 5Y*
- -5.57%
- 10Y*
- -15.86%
FDV
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRS vs. FDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | -1.53% |
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRS and FDV is -0.85, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2026 | -0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRS vs. FDV — Risk / Return Rank
SRS
FDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SRS vs. FDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF (FDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRS | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRS vs. FDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than FDV's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and FDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRS | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -3.33% | -96.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -0.99% | -98.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.26% | -1.07% | -90.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.22% | — | — |
Volatility
SRS vs. FDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRS | FDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.73% | 13.22% | +15.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.81% | 13.22% | +24.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.79% | 13.22% | +27.57% |
SRS vs. FDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FDV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRS vs. FDV - Dividend Comparison
SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than FDV's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDV Federated Hermes U.S. Strategic Dividend ETF | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | 3.56% | 3.61% | 6.06% | 4.49% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.80% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRS and FDV have a correlation of -0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRS.
SRS has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 0.57% for FDV.
SRS is categorized as REIT, while FDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Federated. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRS and 0.50% for FDV.
Find the right allocation for SRS and FDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer