SRS vs. BLDG
SRS (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. SRS is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRS returned -5.84%/yr vs 2.24%/yr for BLDG. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. SRS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
SRS vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRS achieves a -14.05% return, which is significantly lower than BLDG's 5.95% return.
SRS
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- -14.05%
- 6M
- -12.14%
- 1Y
- -9.76%
- 3Y*
- -12.75%
- 5Y*
- -5.84%
- 10Y*
- -16.52%
BLDG
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- 10.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- —
SRS vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | -14.05% | -1.45% | -3.55% | -18.78% | 54.68% | -52.22% | -22.22% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.95% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRS and BLDG is -0.71, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | -0.81 |
The correlation between SRS and BLDG shifts across timeframes, from -0.81 (all time) to -0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SRS vs. BLDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRS
BLDG
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SRS
BLDG
Basic Materials
SRS
-
BLDG
-
Communication Services
SRS
-
BLDG
-
Consumer Cyclical
SRS
-
BLDG
-
Consumer Defensive
SRS
-
BLDG
-
Energy
SRS
-
BLDG
-
Healthcare
SRS
-
BLDG
-
Industrials
SRS
-
BLDG
-
Real Estate
SRS
-
BLDG
Technology
SRS
-
BLDG
-
Utilities
SRS
-
BLDG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRS vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
SRS
BLDG
SRS vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRS | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.16 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 1.02 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 3.60 | -4.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRS | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | 0.93 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.15 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.50 | 0.45 | -0.95 |
Drawdowns
SRS vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and BLDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRS | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -27.25% | -72.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.53% | -10.08% | -10.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.56% | -18.57% | -32.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.56% | -27.25% | -24.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -2.76% | -97.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.23% | -9.23% | -82.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 2.86% | +6.22% |
Volatility
SRS vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) at 3.60%. This indicates that SRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRS | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 3.60% | +3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.34% | 8.23% | +11.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.06% | 11.07% | +15.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.58% | 15.26% | +22.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.67% | 15.54% | +25.13% |
SRS vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRS vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, less than BLDG's 5.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.72% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | 3.67% | 3.61% | 6.06% | 4.49% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.80% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRS and BLDG have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRS has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to BLDG (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRS dropped -99.96% vs BLDG's -27.25%.
On 5-year performance, BLDG leads with 2.24% vs -5.84% for SRS. On fees, BLDG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, BLDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BLDG has performed better with a 2.24% return vs -5.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BLDG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SRS.
BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.72%, compared with 3.67% for SRS.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SRS and 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRS and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer