SRS vs. BITU
SRS (ProShares UltraShort Real Estate) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRS is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while BITU is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SRS returned -12.64% vs -73.89% for BITU. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SRS vs. BITU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRS achieves a -17.34% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -55.56% return.
SRS
- 1D
- -3.83%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- YTD
- -17.34%
- 6M
- -15.94%
- 1Y
- -12.64%
- 3Y*
- -14.13%
- 5Y*
- -6.58%
- 10Y*
- -16.95%
BITU
- 1D
- -5.61%
- 1M
- -40.78%
- YTD
- -55.56%
- 6M
- -61.06%
- 1Y
- -73.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRS vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | -17.34% | -1.45% | -11.46% |
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | -55.56% | -37.07% | 37.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRS and BITU is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRS vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank
SRS
BITU
SRS vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRS | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.84 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.92 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | -1.48 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRS | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 | -0.85 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.50 | -0.37 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
SRS vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRS drawdown since its inception was -99.96%, which is greater than BITU's maximum drawdown of -80.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRS and BITU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRS | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.96% | -80.13% | -19.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.53% | -80.13% | +59.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.96% | -80.13% | -19.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -91.23% | -34.58% | -56.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.15% | 50.09% | -40.94% |
Volatility
SRS vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) is 8.59%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 18.31%. This indicates that SRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRS | BITU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.59% | 18.31% | -9.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.70% | 68.43% | -48.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.32% | 87.07% | -59.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.62% | 97.43% | -59.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.68% | 97.43% | -56.75% |
SRS vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SRS and BITU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SRS vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison
SRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than BITU's 88.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF | 88.31% | 50.23% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRS ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | 3.81% | 3.61% | 6.06% | 4.49% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.80% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRS and BITU have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITU has higher volatility (18.31%) compared to SRS (8.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRS dropped -99.96% vs BITU's -80.13%.
On 1-year performance, SRS leads with -12.64% vs -73.89% for BITU. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SRS has been the lower-risk option at 8.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SRS has performed better with a -12.64% return vs -73.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRS and BITU have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
BITU has the higher dividend yield at 88.31%, compared with 3.81% for SRS.
SRS is categorized as REIT, while BITU is Cryptocurrency. SRS tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (-200%), while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross.
SRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRS and BITU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer