SROI vs. GSG
SROI (Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - SROI is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Calamos, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. SROI is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SROI returned 14.90%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for GSG. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SROI charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
SROI vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SROI achieves a 14.28% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 32.05% return.
SROI
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 11.34%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 1Y
- 21.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.16%
GSG
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- 7.33%
- 6M
- 21.51%
- YTD
- 32.05%
- 1Y
- 36.06%
- 3Y*
- 12.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.82M | $16.77M | $25.29M | |
| $12.03K | $13.42K | $18.49K |
SROI vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF | 14.28% | 16.36% | 9.48% | 9.06% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 32.05% | 5.93% | 8.52% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SROI and GSG is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2023 | 0.02 |
The correlation between SROI and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SROI vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
SROI
GSG
SROI vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SROI | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.26 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 1.93 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 6.13 | +2.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SROI vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SROI drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SROI and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SROI | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.38% | -89.62% | +74.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -18.81% | +8.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.38% | -18.81% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -60.13% | +60.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -63.67% | +61.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 5.90% | -3.45% |
Volatility
SROI vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) is 4.43%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 9.06%. This indicates that SROI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SROI | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 9.06% | -4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.33% | 22.00% | -9.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.61% | 24.45% | -9.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 22.90% | -8.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 22.09% | -8.03% |
SROI vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SROI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SROI vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
SROI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF | 0.53% | 0.60% | 0.68% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SROI and GSG have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSG has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to SROI (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SROI dropped -15.38% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 3-year performance, SROI leads with 14.90% vs 12.37% for GSG. On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SROI has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SROI has performed better with a 14.90% return vs 12.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SROI.
SROI has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
SROI is categorized as Global Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SROI and 0.75% for GSG.
GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SROI and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer