SROI vs. CBXO
SROI (Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF) and CBXO (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - SROI is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Calamos, while CBXO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SROI charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXO.
Performance
SROI vs. CBXO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SROI achieves a 11.41% return, which is significantly higher than CBXO's -3.71% return.
SROI
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 11.41%
- 6M
- 11.69%
- 1Y
- 20.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBXO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- -3.71%
- 6M
- -4.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SROI vs. CBXO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF | 11.41% | 1.13% |
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -3.71% | -8.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between SROI and CBXO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SROI vs. CBXO — Risk / Return Rank
SROI
CBXO
SROI vs. CBXO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBXO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SROI | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SROI | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.02 | -2.36 | +3.38 |
Drawdowns
SROI vs. CBXO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SROI drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, which is greater than CBXO's maximum drawdown of -11.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SROI and CBXO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SROI | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.38% | -11.43% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -11.43% | +11.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -8.47% | +6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | — | — |
Volatility
SROI vs. CBXO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SROI | CBXO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.92% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 7.20% | +6.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 7.20% | +6.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 7.20% | +6.66% |
SROI vs. CBXO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SROI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CBXO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SROI vs. CBXO - Dividend Comparison
SROI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than CBXO's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBXO Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.53% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.68% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SROI and CBXO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBXO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBXO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SROI.
SROI has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.53% for CBXO.
SROI is categorized as Global Equities, while CBXO is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SROI and 0.69% for CBXO.
Find the right allocation for SROI and CBXO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer