SROI vs. CBTY
SROI (Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF) and CBTY (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - SROI is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Calamos, while CBTY is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index. SROI is actively managed, while CBTY is passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SROI charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBTY.
Performance
SROI vs. CBTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SROI achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than CBTY's -11.11% return.
SROI
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBTY
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- -11.11%
- 6M
- -14.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SROI vs. CBTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF | 11.06% | 5.79% |
CBTY Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July | -11.11% | -10.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between SROI and CBTY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SROI vs. CBTY — Risk / Return Rank
SROI
CBTY
SROI vs. CBTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF (SROI) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SROI | CBTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.77 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SROI | CBTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | -1.33 | +2.35 |
Drawdowns
SROI vs. CBTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SROI drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, smaller than the maximum CBTY drawdown of -26.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SROI and CBTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SROI | CBTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.38% | -26.68% | +11.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -26.68% | +25.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -14.52% | +12.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | — | — |
Volatility
SROI vs. CBTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SROI | CBTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 17.11% | -3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.87% | 17.11% | -3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.87% | 17.11% | -3.24% |
SROI vs. CBTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SROI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CBTY's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SROI vs. CBTY - Dividend Comparison
SROI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than CBTY's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBTY Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July | 1.65% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SROI Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sustainable Equities ETF | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.68% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SROI and CBTY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBTY is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBTY is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SROI.
CBTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.54% for SROI.
SROI is categorized as Global Equities, while CBTY is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SROI and 0.69% for CBTY.
Find the right allocation for SROI and CBTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer