CBTY vs. LJUL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CBTY (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July) and LJUL (Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. CBTY is passively managed, while LJUL is actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBTY charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for LJUL.

Performance

CBTY vs. LJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBTY) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBTY achieves a -11.15% return, which is significantly lower than LJUL's 2.02% return.

CBTY

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: -11.15%
• 6M: -11.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LJUL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 2.02%
• 6M: 2.13%
• 1Y: 5.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBTY vs. LJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBTY Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July	-11.15%	-10.94%
LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July	2.02%	3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CBTY and LJUL is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025	0.37

Return for Risk

CBTY vs. LJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBTY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LJUL

LJUL Risk / Return Rank: 97
LJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
LJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
LJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBTY vs. LJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July (CBTY) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBTY	LJUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.55	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	5.81	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.88	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	10.68	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	53.94	—

Drawdowns

CBTY vs. LJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBTY drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, which is greater than LJUL's maximum drawdown of -4.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBTY and LJUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBTY	LJUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.79%	-4.85%	-21.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.72%	0.00%	-26.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.12%	-0.69%	-14.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CBTY	LJUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.12%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.05%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.61%	1.58%	+15.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.61%	4.30%	+12.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.61%	4.30%	+12.31%

CBTY vs. LJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBTY has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than LJUL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBTY vs. LJUL - Dividend Comparison

CBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than LJUL's 5.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CBTY Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - July	1.65%	1.47%	0.00%
LJUL Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July	5.22%	5.36%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBTY and LJUL in my portfolio?

CBTY and LJUL have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CBTY or LJUL?

On fees, CBTY is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBTY or LJUL?

CBTY is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LJUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBTY or LJUL?

LJUL has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 1.65% for CBTY.

What is the main difference between CBTY and LJUL?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBTY and 0.79% for LJUL.