SRLN vs. PFF
SRLN (State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF) and PFF (iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SRLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by State Street, while PFF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the ICE Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. SRLN is actively managed, while PFF is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRLN returned 4.56%/yr vs 3.30%/yr for PFF. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRLN charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for PFF.
Performance
SRLN vs. PFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRLN achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than PFF's 2.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SRLN has outperformed PFF with an annualized return of 4.56%, while PFF has yielded a comparatively lower 3.30% annualized return.
SRLN
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 5.41%
- 3Y*
- 7.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.60%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
PFF
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 9.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.45%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
SRLN vs. PFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 0.75% | 6.77% | 8.43% | 11.62% | -5.30% | 4.49% | 3.13% | 10.03% | -0.66% | 3.39% |
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 2.93% | 4.87% | 7.24% | 9.22% | -18.19% | 7.15% | 7.89% | 15.93% | -4.64% | 8.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRLN and PFF is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2013 | 0.39 |
The correlation between SRLN and PFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRLN vs. PFF — Risk / Return Rank
SRLN
PFF
SRLN vs. PFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRLN | PFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.23 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.72 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.17 | 5.21 | +0.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRLN vs. PFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRLN drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum PFF drawdown of -65.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRLN and PFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRLN | PFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.29% | -65.55% | +43.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.26% | -5.28% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.26% | -10.63% | +6.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.93% | -21.05% | +13.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.29% | -34.10% | +11.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -1.11% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.10% | -5.75% | +4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 1.73% | -0.85% |
Volatility
SRLN vs. PFF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) is 0.58%, while iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF) has a volatility of 2.08%. This indicates that SRLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRLN | PFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | 2.08% | -1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | 5.28% | -2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91% | 6.91% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.91% | 10.33% | -6.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.06% | 12.67% | -6.61% |
SRLN vs. PFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRLN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PFF's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRLN vs. PFF - Dividend Comparison
SRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, more than PFF's 5.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFF iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 5.47% | 6.30% | 6.32% | 6.63% | 6.01% | 4.45% | 4.79% | 5.31% | 6.32% | 5.59% | 5.85% | 5.76% |
SRLN State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | 7.49% | 7.67% | 8.58% | 8.44% | 5.72% | 4.45% | 4.91% | 5.39% | 4.98% | 4.01% | 3.94% | 4.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRLN and PFF have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFF has higher volatility (2.08%) compared to SRLN (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRLN dropped -22.29% vs PFF's -65.55%.
On 10-year performance, SRLN leads with 4.56% vs 3.30% for PFF. On fees, PFF is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, SRLN has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SRLN has performed better with a 4.56% return vs 3.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFF is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for SRLN.
SRLN has the higher dividend yield at 7.49%, compared with 5.47% for PFF.
SRLN is categorized as Bank Loan, while PFF is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for SRLN and 0.46% for PFF.
SRLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRLN and PFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer