PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRLN vs. LFRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRLN vs. LFRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRLN achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than LFRIX's 1.53% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: SRLN at 4.52% and LFRIX at 4.52%.


SRLN

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.94%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
7.44%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
4.52%

LFRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
1.53%
6M
2.10%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
7.67%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
4.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRLN vs. LFRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRLN
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
0.50%6.77%8.43%11.62%-5.30%4.49%3.13%10.03%-0.66%3.39%
LFRIX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund
1.53%6.30%8.28%12.22%-2.99%5.48%-1.47%7.59%-0.01%3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SRLN and LFRIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2013

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRLN vs. LFRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRLN
SRLN Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
SRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

LFRIX
LFRIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LFRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LFRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRLN vs. LFRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SRLNLFRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.97

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

3.92

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

14.80

-8.87

SRLN vs. LFRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the LFRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRLN and LFRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SRLN vs. LFRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRLN drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum LFRIX drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRLN and LFRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRLNLFRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-27.90%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-1.55%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.26%

-2.59%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.93%

-6.23%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.29%

-21.75%

-0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.37%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.10%

-1.94%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

0.41%

+0.47%

Volatility

SRLN vs. LFRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) is 0.53%, while Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) has a volatility of 0.66%. This indicates that SRLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRLNLFRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

0.66%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

1.87%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90%

2.44%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.91%

2.86%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

3.91%

+2.15%

SRLN vs. LFRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRLN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than LFRIX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SRLN vs. LFRIX - Dividend Comparison

SRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than LFRIX's 6.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LFRIX
Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund
6.91%7.20%7.68%7.63%3.95%4.01%4.64%5.71%5.60%4.65%4.64%4.72%
SRLN
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
7.51%7.67%8.58%8.44%5.72%4.45%4.91%5.39%4.98%4.01%3.94%4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRLN and LFRIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LFRIX has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to SRLN (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRLN dropped -22.29% vs LFRIX's -27.90%.

LFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRLN and LFRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer