PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRLN vs. EFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SRLN vs. EFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRLN achieves a 1.21% return, which is significantly higher than EFR's -0.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SRLN has underperformed EFR with an annualized return of 4.52%, while EFR has yielded a comparatively higher 6.02% annualized return.


SRLN

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.70%
6M
0.86%
YTD
1.21%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
4.52%

EFR

1D
0.38%
1M
1.77%
6M
-1.92%
YTD
-0.16%
1Y
-4.49%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
6.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SRLN vs. EFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SRLN
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
1.21%6.77%8.43%11.62%-5.30%4.49%3.13%10.03%-0.66%3.39%
EFR
Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust
-0.16%-4.85%11.32%29.25%-18.73%22.88%0.83%16.43%-6.96%3.37%

Correlation

The correlation between SRLN and EFR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2013

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SRLN vs. EFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRLN
SRLN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SRLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SRLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRLN Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

EFR
EFR Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFR Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
EFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFR Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRLN vs. EFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) and Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SRLNEFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.90

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

-0.39

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.03

-0.78

+5.81

SRLN vs. EFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the EFR Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRLN and EFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SRLN vs. EFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRLN drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum EFR drawdown of -60.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRLN and EFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SRLNEFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.29%

-60.55%

+38.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

-11.49%

+8.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.26%

-18.30%

+14.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.93%

-25.07%

+17.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.29%

-42.04%

+19.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-9.36%

+9.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.09%

-9.01%

+7.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

5.75%

-4.87%

Volatility

SRLN vs. EFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) is 0.66%, while Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that SRLN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SRLNEFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.66%

1.22%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

6.59%

-3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93%

7.84%

-4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.92%

13.06%

-9.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

14.91%

-8.85%

Dividends

SRLN vs. EFR - Dividend Comparison

SRLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, less than EFR's 8.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFR
Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust
8.72%9.53%9.76%10.37%10.39%5.62%6.39%7.34%7.46%5.42%5.82%6.95%
SRLN
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF
7.41%7.67%8.58%8.44%5.72%4.45%4.91%5.39%4.98%4.01%3.94%4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


SRLN and EFR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFR has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to SRLN (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRLN dropped -22.29% vs EFR's -60.55%.

SRLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SRLN and EFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer