PortfoliosLab logo
EFR vs. BUI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EFR and BUI is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EFR vs. BUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) and BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%120.00%140.00%160.00%180.00%200.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
127.72%
202.65%
EFR
BUI

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EFR:

-0.06

BUI:

1.06

Sortino Ratio

EFR:

0.01

BUI:

1.49

Omega Ratio

EFR:

1.00

BUI:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

EFR:

-0.04

BUI:

1.22

Martin Ratio

EFR:

-0.19

BUI:

3.92

Ulcer Index

EFR:

4.22%

BUI:

4.26%

Daily Std Dev

EFR:

13.37%

BUI:

15.77%

Max Drawdown

EFR:

-60.57%

BUI:

-46.49%

Current Drawdown

EFR:

-9.13%

BUI:

-0.27%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EFR:

$350.60M

BUI:

$533.80M

EPS

EFR:

$1.55

BUI:

$1.59

PE Ratio

EFR:

7.71

BUI:

14.89

PEG Ratio

EFR:

0.00

BUI:

0.00

PS Ratio

EFR:

6.18

BUI:

14.66

PB Ratio

EFR:

0.93

BUI:

1.04

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EFR achieves a -4.76% return, which is significantly lower than BUI's 4.01% return. Over the past 10 years, EFR has underperformed BUI with an annualized return of 5.61%, while BUI has yielded a comparatively higher 9.24% annualized return.


EFR

YTD

-4.76%

1M

11.23%

6M

-3.41%

1Y

-1.04%

5Y*

11.08%

10Y*

5.61%

BUI

YTD

4.01%

1M

15.25%

6M

7.40%

1Y

14.54%

5Y*

11.70%

10Y*

9.24%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EFR vs. BUI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EFR is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EFR is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EFR is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EFR is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EFR is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EFR is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

BUI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BUI is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BUI is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BUI is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BUI is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BUI is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BUI is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EFR vs. BUI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) and BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EFR Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the BUI Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EFR and BUI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.06
1.06
EFR
BUI

Dividends

EFR vs. BUI - Dividend Comparison

EFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.66%, more than BUI's 6.42% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EFR
Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust
10.66%9.76%9.42%9.65%5.62%5.87%7.34%7.46%5.42%5.80%7.55%6.11%
BUI
BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust
6.42%6.26%6.65%6.99%5.45%5.80%6.51%7.35%6.72%7.89%8.65%7.00%

Drawdowns

EFR vs. BUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EFR drawdown since its inception was -60.57%, which is greater than BUI's maximum drawdown of -46.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EFR and BUI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-9.13%
-0.27%
EFR
BUI

Volatility

EFR vs. BUI - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust (EFR) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust (BUI) at 5.69%. This indicates that EFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.23%
5.69%
EFR
BUI

Financials

EFR vs. BUI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Vance Senior Floating-Rate Trust and BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20.00MJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
14.48M
16.95M
(EFR) Total Revenue
(BUI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items