SRIU.L vs. UC15.L
SRIU.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SRIU.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while UC15.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRIU.L returned 12.78%/yr vs 12.77%/yr for UC15.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SRIU.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UC15.L.
Performance
SRIU.L vs. UC15.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRIU.L achieves a 13.81% return, which is significantly lower than UC15.L's 21.49% return.
SRIU.L
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 8.42%
- YTD
- 13.81%
- 6M
- 12.98%
- 1Y
- 27.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.86%
- 5Y*
- 12.78%
- 10Y*
- —
UC15.L
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 21.49%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 32.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
SRIU.L vs. UC15.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRIU.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 13.81% | 3.18% | 21.24% | 25.25% | -15.68% | 31.46% | -7.21% |
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 21.49% | 2.57% | 6.44% | -6.52% | 29.97% | 36.11% | 22.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRIU.L and UC15.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2020 | 0.11 |
The correlation between SRIU.L and UC15.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SRIU.L vs. UC15.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRIU.L
UC15.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
SRIU.L
UC15.L
Financial Services
SRIU.L
UC15.L
Consumer Cyclical
SRIU.L
UC15.L
Industrials
SRIU.L
UC15.L
Healthcare
SRIU.L
UC15.L
Consumer Defensive
SRIU.L
UC15.L
Communication Services
SRIU.L
UC15.L
Real Estate
SRIU.L
UC15.L
-
Basic Materials
SRIU.L
UC15.L
Utilities
SRIU.L
UC15.L
Energy
SRIU.L
-
UC15.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRIU.L vs. UC15.L — Risk / Return Rank
SRIU.L
UC15.L
SRIU.L vs. UC15.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRIU.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.39 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 5.23 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.16 | 13.93 | -4.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRIU.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.12 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.87 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.33 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
SRIU.L vs. UC15.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRIU.L drawdown since its inception was -24.84%, smaller than the maximum UC15.L drawdown of -42.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRIU.L and UC15.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRIU.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.84% | -42.93% | +18.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -6.18% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | -13.98% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.56% | -17.43% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -3.53% | +3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | -15.17% | +8.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.32% | +0.66% |
Volatility
SRIU.L vs. UC15.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) is 4.11%, while UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that SRIU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UC15.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRIU.L | UC15.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 5.07% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 12.34% | -3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 15.26% | -3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 14.69% | +2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 14.80% | +5.96% |
SRIU.L vs. UC15.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRIU.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than UC15.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRIU.L vs. UC15.L - Dividend Comparison
SRIU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, while UC15.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRIU.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.70% | 0.98% | 0.51% | 0.94% | 1.08% | 0.80% | 0.21% |
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRIU.L and UC15.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SRIU.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SRIU.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC15.L.
SRIU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UC15.L is Commodities. SRIU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SRIU.L and 0.34% for UC15.L.
Find the right allocation for SRIU.L and UC15.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer