SRIU.L vs. BBUS.L
SRIU.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and BBUS.L (BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from UBS and JPMorgan respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SRIU.L returned 12.89%/yr vs 14.49%/yr for BBUS.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SRIU.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BBUS.L.
Performance
SRIU.L vs. BBUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SRIU.L is traded in GBp, while BBUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BBUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRIU.L achieves a 14.39% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS.L's 10.46% return.
SRIU.L
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 14.39%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 5.64%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 28.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 14.49%
- 10Y*
- —
SRIU.L vs. BBUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRIU.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 14.39% | 3.18% | 21.24% | 25.25% | -15.68% | 31.46% | -7.21% |
BBUS.L BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc | 10.46% | 9.16% | 27.18% | 21.25% | -10.45% | 28.84% | 20.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRIU.L and BBUS.L is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2020 | 0.69 |
The correlation between SRIU.L and BBUS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (5 years) to 0.82 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SRIU.L vs. BBUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SRIU.L
BBUS.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
SRIU.L
BBUS.L
Financial Services
SRIU.L
BBUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
SRIU.L
BBUS.L
Industrials
SRIU.L
BBUS.L
Healthcare
SRIU.L
BBUS.L
Consumer Defensive
SRIU.L
BBUS.L
Communication Services
SRIU.L
BBUS.L
Real Estate
SRIU.L
BBUS.L
Basic Materials
SRIU.L
BBUS.L
Utilities
SRIU.L
BBUS.L
Energy
SRIU.L
-
BBUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRIU.L vs. BBUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SRIU.L
BBUS.L
SRIU.L vs. BBUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SRIU.L | BBUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.44 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 3.70 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | 12.18 | -2.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SRIU.L | BBUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.39 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 0.93 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.90 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
SRIU.L vs. BBUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRIU.L drawdown since its inception was -24.84%, smaller than the maximum BBUS.L drawdown of -26.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRIU.L and BBUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRIU.L | BBUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.84% | -26.39% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.71% | -7.71% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.56% | -21.39% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.56% | -21.39% | -1.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.27% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -3.81% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.34% | +0.64% |
Volatility
SRIU.L vs. BBUS.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L) at 3.61%. This indicates that SRIU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRIU.L | BBUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 3.61% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 8.70% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.22% | 11.98% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 15.58% | +1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.77% | 17.27% | +3.50% |
SRIU.L vs. BBUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRIU.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SRIU.L vs. BBUS.L - Dividend Comparison
SRIU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, while BBUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS.L BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRIU.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.70% | 0.98% | 0.51% | 0.94% | 1.08% | 0.80% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRIU.L and BBUS.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for SRIU.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for SRIU.L and 0.04% for BBUS.L.
Find the right allocation for SRIU.L and BBUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer