PCBIX vs. CMGIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX) and BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX).
PCBIX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Dec 6, 2000. CMGIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 27, 1996.
Performance
PCBIX vs. CMGIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCBIX vs. CMGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCBIX Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class | -12.96% | 1.62% | 23.63% | 25.92% | -23.16% | 25.22% | 18.25% | 49.40% | -6.86% | 25.32% |
CMGIX BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | -8.46% | 0.49% | 12.44% | 28.24% | -37.36% | 14.51% | 46.13% | 36.19% | 2.88% | 34.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCBIX achieves a -12.96% return, which is significantly lower than CMGIX's -8.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PCBIX having a 11.48% annualized return and CMGIX not far behind at 10.94%.
PCBIX
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -9.56%
- YTD
- -12.96%
- 6M
- -16.52%
- 1Y
- -11.19%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
CMGIX
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- -11.71%
- YTD
- -8.46%
- 6M
- -13.16%
- 1Y
- 6.17%
- 3Y*
- 6.01%
- 5Y*
- -0.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCBIX vs. CMGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCBIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than CMGIX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCBIX vs. CMGIX — Risk / Return Rank
PCBIX
CMGIX
PCBIX vs. CMGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX) and BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCBIX | CMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | 0.22 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | 0.50 | -1.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.06 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 0.10 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | 0.32 | -2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCBIX | CMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | 0.22 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | -0.04 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.47 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.38 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCBIX and CMGIX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PCBIX vs. CMGIX - Dividend Comparison
PCBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, less than CMGIX's 23.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCBIX Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class | 6.68% | 5.81% | 6.40% | 2.51% | 3.18% | 7.96% | 1.08% | 9.02% | 12.24% | 3.31% | 2.49% | 6.30% |
CMGIX BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | 23.16% | 21.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.94% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 4.72% | 3.31% | 0.00% | 2.57% |
Drawdowns
PCBIX vs. CMGIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCBIX drawdown since its inception was -50.25%, smaller than the maximum CMGIX drawdown of -73.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCBIX and CMGIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCBIX | CMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.25% | -73.85% | +23.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.29% | -14.90% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.17% | -45.96% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.56% | -45.96% | +5.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.65% | -22.37% | +3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -28.76% | +22.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.44% | 4.72% | +1.72% |
Volatility
PCBIX vs. CMGIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX) is 4.56%, while BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX) has a volatility of 8.49%. This indicates that PCBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCBIX | CMGIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 8.49% | -3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.34% | 16.53% | -6.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.28% | 25.80% | -7.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 24.95% | -6.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 23.29% | -4.20% |