PortfoliosLab logo
PCBIX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PCBIX and FCNTX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

PCBIX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PCBIX:

0.84

FCNTX:

0.85

Sortino Ratio

PCBIX:

1.03

FCNTX:

1.20

Omega Ratio

PCBIX:

1.13

FCNTX:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

PCBIX:

0.73

FCNTX:

0.86

Martin Ratio

PCBIX:

2.46

FCNTX:

2.91

Ulcer Index

PCBIX:

5.08%

FCNTX:

5.85%

Daily Std Dev

PCBIX:

19.08%

FCNTX:

22.18%

Max Drawdown

PCBIX:

-50.33%

FCNTX:

-49.03%

Current Drawdown

PCBIX:

-4.98%

FCNTX:

-3.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCBIX achieves a 2.51% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 4.71% return. Over the past 10 years, PCBIX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 11.87%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.30% annualized return.


PCBIX

YTD

2.51%

1M

3.49%

6M

-4.98%

1Y

15.48%

3Y*

13.56%

5Y*

13.40%

10Y*

11.87%

FCNTX

YTD

4.71%

1M

8.28%

6M

3.75%

1Y

18.76%

3Y*

21.80%

5Y*

17.66%

10Y*

15.30%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Fidelity Contrafund Fund

PCBIX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCBIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PCBIX vs. FCNTX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCBIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PCBIX is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PCBIX is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PCBIX is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PCBIX is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PCBIX is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PCBIX is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCNTX is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PCBIX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PCBIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCBIX and FCNTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PCBIX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

PCBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than FCNTX's 4.77% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PCBIX
Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class
3.18%3.26%2.51%3.18%7.96%1.08%4.75%12.24%3.31%2.49%6.31%5.26%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund
4.77%4.19%4.26%13.65%10.80%8.01%4.16%9.14%6.08%3.81%5.33%7.29%

Drawdowns

PCBIX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCBIX drawdown since its inception was -50.33%, roughly equal to the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCBIX and FCNTX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PCBIX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal MidCap Fund Institutional Class (PCBIX) is 4.73%, while Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that PCBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...