PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SRHQ vs. FTDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SRHQ vs. FTDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) and First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SRHQ vs. FTDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SRHQ
SRH U.S. Quality ETF
3.14%7.34%16.49%21.81%4.20%
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
7.05%13.64%11.12%11.75%3.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SRHQ achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly lower than FTDS's 7.05% return.


SRHQ

1D
1.62%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
3.14%
6M
5.60%
1Y
14.99%
3Y*
14.85%
5Y*
10Y*

FTDS

1D
-0.28%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
7.05%
6M
9.20%
1Y
19.97%
3Y*
14.76%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
11.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SRHQ vs. FTDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SRHQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FTDS's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SRHQ vs. FTDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SRHQ
SRHQ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SRHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SRHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FTDS
FTDS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FTDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTDS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FTDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTDS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SRHQ vs. FTDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) and First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SRHQFTDSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.81

1.12

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

1.69

-0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.23

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

1.56

-0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.77

6.97

-1.20

SRHQ vs. FTDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SRHQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the FTDS Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SRHQ and FTDS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SRHQFTDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

1.12

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.32

+0.63

Correlation

The correlation between SRHQ and FTDS is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SRHQ vs. FTDS - Dividend Comparison

SRHQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than FTDS's 1.65% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SRHQ
SRH U.S. Quality ETF
0.76%0.76%0.66%0.84%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTDS
First Trust Dividend Strength ETF
1.65%1.59%2.05%2.15%2.31%0.72%0.99%1.13%1.14%0.79%1.24%0.95%

Drawdowns

SRHQ vs. FTDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SRHQ drawdown since its inception was -18.50%, smaller than the maximum FTDS drawdown of -56.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRHQ and FTDS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SRHQFTDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.50%

-56.53%

+38.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-12.98%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-4.01%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-9.92%

+6.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

2.91%

-0.25%

Volatility

SRHQ vs. FTDS - Volatility Comparison

SRH U.S. Quality ETF (SRHQ) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to First Trust Dividend Strength ETF (FTDS) at 2.78%. This indicates that SRHQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SRHQFTDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

2.78%

+3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

9.68%

+1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.69%

17.98%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

17.64%

-1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.14%

20.14%

-4.00%