SQS vs. ROE
SQS (Sapient Quality Select ETF) and ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) are both Quality Factor funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SQS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ROE.
Performance
SQS vs. ROE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SQS
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ROE
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 16.21%
- YTD
- 20.35%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.32%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.20M | $1.18M | $910.23K | |
| $368.93K | $275.74K | $458.12K |
SQS vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SQS Sapient Quality Select ETF | 8.23% |
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 18.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQS and ROE is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.76 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQS vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank
SQS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROE
SQS vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQS | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.72 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQS vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQS drawdown since its inception was -7.90%, smaller than the maximum ROE drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQS and ROE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQS | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -19.10% | +11.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -1.30% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -2.54% | +0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility
SQS vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQS | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.52% | 15.07% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 15.87% | +2.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.52% | 15.87% | +2.65% |
SQS vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQS vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison
SQS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 1.01% | 0.97% | 1.18% | 0.68% |
SQS Sapient Quality Select ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQS and ROE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for SQS.
ROE has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for SQS.
They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SQS and 0.49% for ROE.
Find the right allocation for SQS and ROE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer