SQS vs. INFL
SQS (Sapient Quality Select ETF) and INFL (Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SQS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for INFL.
Performance
SQS vs. INFL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SQS
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFL
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- -3.00%
- YTD
- 14.32%
- 6M
- 13.46%
- 1Y
- 21.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- —
SQS vs. INFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SQS Sapient Quality Select ETF | 8.21% |
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF | -2.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQS and INFL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2026 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQS vs. INFL — Risk / Return Rank
SQS
INFL
SQS vs. INFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sapient Quality Select ETF (SQS) and Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF (INFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQS | INFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.24 | 0.88 | +1.36 |
Drawdowns
SQS vs. INFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQS drawdown since its inception was -7.18%, smaller than the maximum INFL drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQS and INFL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQS | INFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -21.30% | +14.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.14% | -7.84% | +3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -5.11% | +3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.11% | — |
Volatility
SQS vs. INFL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQS | INFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.82% | 15.88% | +2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 17.76% | +1.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 17.69% | +1.13% |
SQS vs. INFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than INFL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQS vs. INFL - Dividend Comparison
SQS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INFL Horizon Kinetics Inflation Beneficiaries ETF | 0.93% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 0.91% |
SQS Sapient Quality Select ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQS and INFL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SQS is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SQS is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for INFL.
INFL has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.00% for SQS.
They also come from different issuers: Sapient and Horizon Kinetics LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for SQS and 0.85% for INFL.
Find the right allocation for SQS and INFL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer