SQQQ vs. BRKL
SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SQQQ is passively managed, while BRKL is actively managed. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
SQQQ vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SQQQ
- 1D
- -5.26%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- 6M
- -34.63%
- YTD
- -38.05%
- 1Y
- -54.82%
- 3Y*
- -52.10%
- 5Y*
- -44.80%
- 10Y*
- -54.51%
- ALL TIME*
- -52.82%
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.37K | $14.77K | $14.77K | |
| $2.77B | $2.43B | $2.72B |
SQQQ vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 8.23% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQQQ and BRKL is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQQQ vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank
SQQQ
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SQQQ vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQQQ | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.65 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQQQ vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQQQ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQQQ and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQQQ | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -7.03% | -92.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | 0.00% | -100.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.78% | -3.93% | -88.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.25% | — | — |
Volatility
SQQQ vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQQQ | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.07% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.95% | 30.17% | +27.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.24% | 30.17% | +38.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.78% | 30.17% | +36.61% |
SQQQ vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQQQ vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, while BRKL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 9.64% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQQQ and BRKL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.64%, compared with 0.00% for BRKL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SQQQ and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for SQQQ and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer