SQQQ vs. BND
SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SQQQ returned -55.68%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for BND. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SQQQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
SQQQ vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQQQ achieves a -39.28% return, which is significantly lower than BND's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SQQQ has underperformed BND with an annualized return of -55.68%, while BND has yielded a comparatively higher 1.53% annualized return.
SQQQ
- 1D
- -4.47%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- YTD
- -39.28%
- 6M
- -36.43%
- 1Y
- -60.85%
- 3Y*
- -54.68%
- 5Y*
- -47.98%
- 10Y*
- -55.68%
BND
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.05%
- 10Y*
- 1.53%
SQQQ vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -39.28% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | -0.07% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | 8.84% | -0.12% | 3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQQQ and BND is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010 | 0.06 |
The correlation between SQQQ and BND shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQQQ vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
SQQQ
BND
SQQQ vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SQQQ | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.23 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 1.83 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.69 | 5.43 | -7.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SQQQ | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.22 | 1.32 | -2.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.72 | -0.01 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.84 | 0.28 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.87 | 0.58 | -1.45 |
Drawdowns
SQQQ vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQQQ drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQQQ and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQQQ | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -18.58% | -81.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.71% | -2.68% | -63.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.38% | -5.92% | -86.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.23% | -17.91% | -79.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.98% | -18.58% | -81.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -2.70% | -97.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -92.40% | -3.06% | -89.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.98% | 0.90% | +35.08% |
Volatility
SQQQ vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a higher volatility of 19.65% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.20%. This indicates that SQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQQQ | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.65% | 1.20% | +18.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.23% | 2.69% | +36.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.16% | 3.72% | +46.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.95% | 6.02% | +60.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.30% | 5.53% | +60.77% |
SQQQ vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
SQQQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SQQQ vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.25%, more than BND's 3.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.98% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 11.25% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQQQ and BND have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (19.65%) compared to BND (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQQQ dropped -100.00% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 10-year performance, BND leads with 1.53% vs -55.68% for SQQQ. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BND has performed better with a 1.53% return vs -55.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 11.25%, compared with 3.98% for BND.
SQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BND is Total Bond Market. SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%), while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SQQQ and 0.03% for BND.
BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQQQ and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer