SQM vs. PCY
SQM (Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.) is a stock, while PCY (Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the DB Emerging Market USD Liquid Balanced Index. Over the past 10 years, SQM returned 15.24%/yr vs 2.13%/yr for PCY. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SQM vs. PCY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SQM achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly higher than PCY's 1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SQM has outperformed PCY with an annualized return of 15.24%, while PCY has yielded a comparatively lower 2.13% annualized return.
SQM
- 1D
- -1.96%
- 1M
- -14.11%
- 6M
- -13.04%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 1Y
- 98.52%
- 3Y*
- -1.60%
- 5Y*
- 13.19%
- 10Y*
- 15.24%
PCY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 12.23%
- 3Y*
- 9.66%
- 5Y*
- 1.15%
- 10Y*
- 2.13%
SQM vs. PCY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 5.14% | 89.55% | -39.35% | -18.47% | 71.62% | 6.82% | 89.19% | -27.30% | -32.71% | 115.00% |
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | 1.70% | 16.31% | 2.55% | 18.48% | -24.47% | -4.30% | 2.29% | 17.66% | -6.16% | 9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between SQM and PCY is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SQM vs. PCY — Risk / Return Rank
SQM
PCY
SQM vs. PCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) and Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SQM | PCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 2.08 | +1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | 8.38 | +1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SQM vs. PCY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SQM drawdown since its inception was -78.34%, which is greater than PCY's maximum drawdown of -49.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SQM and PCY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SQM | PCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.34% | -49.13% | -29.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.18% | -5.91% | -20.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.32% | -11.52% | -49.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.76% | -37.17% | -32.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.98% | -37.78% | -35.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.04% | -1.63% | -25.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.30% | -6.94% | -23.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.12% | 1.46% | +8.66% |
Volatility
SQM vs. PCY - Volatility Comparison
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF (PCY) at 1.78%. This indicates that SQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SQM | PCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.68% | 1.78% | +7.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.40% | 6.06% | +30.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.03% | 7.33% | +43.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.82% | 13.18% | +36.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.16% | 12.94% | +33.22% |
Dividends
SQM vs. PCY - Dividend Comparison
SQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than PCY's 5.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCY Invesco Emerging Markets Sovereign Debt ETF | 5.90% | 5.93% | 6.65% | 6.48% | 6.81% | 4.80% | 4.45% | 4.78% | 4.93% | 4.80% | 5.19% | 5.46% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 1.61% | 0.18% | 0.59% | 8.34% | 9.66% | 3.92% | 1.64% | 4.55% | 5.37% | 2.73% | 4.77% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SQM and PCY have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQM has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to PCY (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SQM dropped -78.34% vs PCY's -49.13%.
SQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SQM and PCY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer