PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYW.DE vs. TRET.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYW.DE vs. TRET.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPYW.DE) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SPYW.DE is traded in EUR, while TRET.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TRET.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYW.DE achieves a 7.38% return, which is significantly lower than TRET.L's 9.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SPYW.DE has outperformed TRET.L with an annualized return of 7.56%, while TRET.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.35% annualized return.


SPYW.DE

1D
-0.17%
1M
2.41%
YTD
7.38%
6M
9.46%
1Y
11.00%
3Y*
13.77%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*
7.56%

TRET.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.28%
YTD
9.60%
6M
10.28%
1Y
14.42%
3Y*
9.28%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
5.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYW.DE vs. TRET.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPYW.DE
SPDR S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.38%20.21%8.31%17.92%-11.22%14.38%-11.88%23.33%-8.56%11.23%
TRET.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
9.60%0.83%7.75%10.50%-21.06%39.44%-14.59%39.71%5.72%-15.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SPYW.DE and TRET.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2012

0.42

The correlation between SPYW.DE and TRET.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.53 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYW.DE vs. TRET.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYW.DE
SPYW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SPYW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

TRET.L
TRET.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TRET.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRET.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRET.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TRET.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRET.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYW.DE vs. TRET.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPYW.DE) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYW.DETRET.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.78

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.55

5.60

-1.05

SPYW.DE vs. TRET.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the TRET.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYW.DE and TRET.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYW.DE vs. TRET.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYW.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, smaller than the maximum TRET.L drawdown of -41.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYW.DE and TRET.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYW.DETRET.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.67%

-41.66%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.99%

-8.05%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.64%

-17.58%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.99%

-30.64%

+6.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.67%

-41.66%

+2.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-0.47%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-12.73%

+7.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

2.57%

-0.17%

Volatility

SPYW.DE vs. TRET.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (SPYW.DE) is 2.42%, while VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that SPYW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRET.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYW.DETRET.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

4.61%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.80%

10.02%

-1.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.71%

12.79%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.29%

16.00%

-2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

18.18%

-3.34%

SPYW.DE vs. TRET.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYW.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TRET.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYW.DE vs. TRET.L - Dividend Comparison

SPYW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than TRET.L's 3.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYW.DE
SPDR S&P Euro Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.53%4.07%3.67%3.31%3.62%2.78%3.05%3.10%3.74%3.15%2.97%2.99%
TRET.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
3.36%3.54%3.56%3.54%4.55%1.86%4.18%3.32%5.03%3.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYW.DE and TRET.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRET.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRET.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPYW.DE.

SPYW.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while TRET.L is REIT. SPYW.DE tracks S&P Euro High Yield Dividend Aristocrats, while TRET.L tracks GPR Global 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SPYW.DE and 0.25% for TRET.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYW.DE and TRET.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer