PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPYV vs. PMJA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPYV vs. PMJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January (PMJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SPYV achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly higher than PMJA's 2.26% return.


SPYV

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
7.47%
6M
6.91%
1Y
20.05%
3Y*
15.17%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*
12.11%

PMJA

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.14%
YTD
2.26%
6M
2.38%
1Y
7.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPYV vs. PMJA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SPYV and PMJA is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2025

0.74

The correlation between SPYV and PMJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPYV vs. PMJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

PMJA
PMJA Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PMJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMJA Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PMJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMJA Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPYV vs. PMJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January (PMJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPYVPMJADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.79

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

4.91

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.32

24.37

-12.06

SPYV vs. PMJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SPYV Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is lower than the PMJA Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SPYV and PMJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPYV vs. PMJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SPYV drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than PMJA's maximum drawdown of -2.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPYV and PMJA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPYVPMJADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.45%

-2.98%

-55.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.22%

-1.45%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-0.22%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.70%

-0.33%

-8.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

0.29%

+1.34%

Volatility

SPYV vs. PMJA - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January (PMJA) at 0.54%. This indicates that SPYV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPYVPMJADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

0.54%

+2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.33%

1.57%

+5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.97%

2.04%

+7.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

2.83%

+11.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

2.83%

+14.10%

SPYV vs. PMJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPYV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PMJA's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SPYV vs. PMJA - Dividend Comparison

SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while PMJA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PMJA
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.73%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPYV and PMJA have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYV has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to PMJA (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPYV dropped -58.45% vs PMJA's -2.98%.

On 1-year performance, SPYV leads with 20.05% vs 7.11% for PMJA. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, PMJA has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPYV has performed better with a 20.05% return vs 7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMJA.

SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for PMJA.

SPYV is categorized as S&P 500, while PMJA is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: State Street and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SPYV and 0.50% for PMJA.

PMJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPYV and PMJA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer